Journal:Electronic tools in clinical laboratory diagnostics: Key examples, limitations, and value in laboratory medicine
| Full article title | Electronic tools in clinical laboratory diagnostics: Key examples, limitations, and value in laboratory medicine |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Laboratory Medicine |
| Author(s) | Bohn, Mary K.; Fabiano, Giulia F.; Adeli, Khosrow |
| Author affiliation(s) | The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto |
| Primary contact | khosrow dot adeli at sickkids dot ca |
| Year published | 2021 |
| Volume and issue | 45(6) |
| Page(s) | 319–24 |
| DOI | 10.1515/labmed-2021-0114 |
| ISSN | 2567-9430 |
| Distribution license | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International |
| Website | https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/labmed-2021-0114/html |
| Download | https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/labmed-2021-0114/pdf (PDF) |
 |
This article should be considered a work in progress and incomplete. Consider this article incomplete until this notice is removed. |
Abstract
Electronic tools in clinical laboratory diagnostics can assist laboratory professionals, clinicians, and patients in medical diagnostic management and laboratory test interpretation. With increasing implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) and laboratory information systems (LIS) worldwide, there is increasing demand for well-designed and evidence-based electronic resources. Both complex data-driven and simple interpretative electronic healthcare tools are currently available to improve the integration of clinical and laboratory information towards a more patient-centered approach to medicine. Several studies have reported positive clinical impact of electronic healthcare tool implementation in clinical laboratory diagnostics, including in the management of neonatal bilirubinemia, cardiac disease, and nutritional status. As patients have increasing access to their medical laboratory data, it is essential that accessible electronic healthcare tools are evidence-based and user-friendly for individuals of varying digital and medical literacy. Indeed, studies suggest electronic healthcare tool development processes significantly lack the involvement of relevant healthcare professionals and often present misinformation, including erroneous calculation algorithms or inappropriate interpretative recommendations.
The current review provides an overview of the utility of available electronic healthcare tools in clinical laboratory diagnostics and critically reviews potential limitations and benefits of their clinical implementation. The Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) online database is also detailed as an example of a pediatric diagnostic tool with widespread global impact.
Keywords: electronic health record, electronic laboratory diagnostic tools, patient-centered medicine, laboratory information system
Introduction
References
Notes
This presentation is faithful to the original, with only a few minor changes to presentation, grammar, and spelling. In some cases important information was missing from the references, and that information was added.
