Difference between revisions of "LII:LIMSpec/Introduction and methodology"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Introduction==
==Introduction and methodology==
Merriam-Webster defines a "specification" as "a detailed precise presentation of something or of a plan or proposal for something."<ref name="MWSpec">{{cite web |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/specification  |title=specification |work=Merriam-Webster |publisher=Merriam-Webster, Inc |accessdate=20 September 2019}}</ref> In other words, an existing or theoretical product, concept, or idea is presented in detail for a particular audience. In a broad sense, detailing the specifics about a project, concept, or idea to others is just common sense. This applies just as well to the world of software development, where a software requirements specification is essential for preventing the second most commonly cited reason for project failure: poor requirements management.<ref name="BiegRequire14">{{cite web |url=https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/requirements-management.pdf |format=PDF |title=Introduction |work=Requirements Management: A Core Competency for Project and Program Success |author=Bieg, D.P. |publisher=Project Management Institute |page=3 |date=August 2014 |accessdate=20 September 2019}}</ref>
{{LIMSpec/Introduction and methodology}}
 
Over the years, a wide variety of companies, consultants, and researchers have compiled public and private software requirements documents for [[laboratory informatics]] systems. These compiled lists of requirements for how a given laboratory informatics solution should be developed, delivered, and maintained have changed as technology and user demand evolved. Often times, these requirements documents turn into a mix of "wishlist" requirements from potential and active clients, as well as regulation-mandated requirements. The wishlist items aren't necessarily ignored by developers, but they do in fact have to be prioritized as "nice to have" or "essential to system operation," or something in between.<ref name="Hirsch10Steps13">{{cite web |url=https://www.phase2technology.com/blog/successful-requirements-gathering |title=10 Steps To Successful Requirements Gathering |author=Hirsch, J. |publisher=Phase2 Technology, LLC |date=22 November 2013 |accessdate=20 September 2019}}</ref><ref name="BurrissSoftware07">{{cite web |url=http://sce2.umkc.edu/BIT/burrise/pl/requirements/ |title=Requirements Specification |work=CS451R, University of Missouri–Kansas City |author=Burris, E. |publisher=University of Missouri–Kansas City |date=2007 |accessdate=20 September 2019}}</ref> While this reasonable mix of requirements has served informatics software developers well, sometimes a fresh approach is required.
 
What follows is an attempt to look less at the wishlists of laboratories and more directly at what requirements current regulatory schemes, industry standards, and organizational guidelines place on the ever-evolving array of laboratory informatics systems being developed today. What does the United States' [[21 CFR Part 11]] have to say about how your [[laboratory information management system]] (LIMS), [[laboratory information system]] (LIS), [[electronic laboratory notebook]] (ELN), and other systems operate? What does the European Union's Annex 11 dictate in those same regards? The following five chapters list those requirements, supported by one or more regulations, standards, and guidelines.
 
==Methodology==
At its core, this LIMSpec—which has seen several iterations over the years—is rooted in [[ASTM E1578|ASTM E1578-18]] ''Standard Guide for Laboratory Informatics''. With the latest version released in 2018, an updated Laboratory Informatics Functional Requirements checklist is included in the appendix, which "covers functionality common to the various laboratory informatics systems discussed throughout [the] guide as well as requirements recommended as part of [the] guide." It goes on to state that the checklist "is an example of typical requirements that can be used to guide the purchase, upgrade, or development of a laboratory informatics system," though it is certainly "not meant to be exhaustive."
 
This LIMSpec borrows from that requirements checklist and then adds more to it from a wide variety of sources. An attempt has been made to find the most relevant regulations, standards, and guidance that shape how a compliant laboratory informatics system is developed and maintained. However, this should definitely be considered a work in progress, with more to be added with additional public and private comment on missing sources.
 
That said, this first revision taps into the following sources:
 
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/7/part-331 7 CFR Part 331]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/9/part-121 9 CFR Part 121]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/part-7 21 CFR Part 7]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/part-11 21 CFR Part 11]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/part-58 21 CFR Part 58]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/part-211 21 CFR Part 211]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/part-212 21 CFR Part 212]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/part-225 21 CFR Part 225]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/part-226 21 CFR Part 226]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/part-312 21 CFR Part 312]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/part-606 21 CFR Part 606]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/part-810 21 CFR Part 810]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/part-812 21 CFR Part 812]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/part-820 21 CFR Part 820]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/1910.120 29 CFR Part 1910.120]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/1910.134 29 CFR Part 1910.134]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/1910.1030 29 CFR Part 1910.1030]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/1910.1096 29 CFR Part 1910.1096]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/1910.1200 29 CFR Part 1910.1200]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/1910.1450 29 CFR Part 1910.1450]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/part-3 40 CFR Part 3]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/part-60 40 CFR Part 60]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/part-62 40 CFR Part 62]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/part-63 40 CFR Part 63]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/part-141 40 CFR Part 141]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/part-370 40 CFR Part 370]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/part-372 40 CFR Part 372]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/part-704 40 CFR Part 704]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/part-717 40 CFR Part 717]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/part-720 40 CFR Part 720]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/part-73 42 CFR Part 73]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/part-493 42 CFR Part 493]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/part-160 45 CFR Part 160]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/part-162 45 CFR Part 162]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/part-164 45 CFR Part 164]
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/part-170 45 CFR Part 170]
* [https://www.aafco.org/Publications/QA-QC-Guidelines-for-Feed-Laboratories AAFCO QA/QC Guidelines for Feed Laboratories]
* [https://www.aavld.org/accreditation-requirements-page AAVLD Requirements for an AVMDL]
* [http://www.abft.org/files/ABFT_LAP_Standards_May_31_2013.pdf ABFT Accreditation Manual]
* [https://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org/Policies/Pages/default.aspx AIHA-LAP Policies 2018]
* [http://des.wa.gov/sites/default/files/public/documents/About/1063/RFP/Add7_Item4ASCLD.pdf  ASCLD/LAB Supp. Reqs. for the Accreditation of Forensic Science Testing Laboratories]
* [https://www.astm.org/Standards/E1188.htm ASTM E1188-11]
* [https://www.astm.org/Standards/E1459.htm ASTM E1459-13]
* [https://www.astm.org/Standards/E1492.htm ASTM E1492-11]
* [https://www.astm.org/Standards/E1578.htm ASTM E1578-18]
* [https://www.cdc.gov/phin/tools/phinms/index.html CDC PHIN Messaging System]
* [https://www.fbi.gov/services/cjis/cjis-security-policy-resource-center CJIS Security Policy]
* [https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-4/annex11_01-2011_en.pdf E.U. Annex 11]
* [https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-1/dir_2003_94/dir_2003_94_en.pdf E.U. Commission Directive 2003/94/EC]
* [https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=30006MXP.PDF EPA 815-R-05-004]
* [https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/erln_lab_requirements.pdf EPA ERLN Laboratory Requirements v1.6]
* [https://www.epa.gov/geospatial/epa-metadata-technical-specification EPA Metadata Technical Specification]
* [https://www.epa.gov/quality/guidance-quality-assurance-project-plans-epa-qag-5 EPA QA/G-5]
* [https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-07/documents/sedd52_specification.pdf EPA SEDD Specification and Data Element Dictionary v5.2]
* [https://elexnet.fda.gov/elex/documents/eLEXNET_DX_Brochure_Aug_2011.pdf FDA eLEXNET Data Exchange Program]
* [https://www.fda.gov/food/hazard-analysis-critical-control-point-haccp/haccp-principles-application-guidelines FDA Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)]
* [https://www.icar.org/Guidelines/15-Data-Exchange.pdf ICAR 15 Data Exchange]
* [https://www.iso.org/standard/56115.html ISO 15189:2012]
* [https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html ISO/IEC 17025:2017]
* [https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahln/downloads/MessagingQuickGuide.pdf NAHLN HL7 Messaging Quick User Guide]
* [https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/lab-info-services/nahln/ct_nahln_it NAHLN Information Technology System]
* [http://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/oecdseriesonprinciplesofgoodlaboratorypracticeglpandcompliancemonitoring.htm OECD GLP Principles]
* [https://www.ams.usda.gov/datasets/pdp/pdp-standard-operating-procedures USDA Administrative Procedures for the Pesticide Data Program (PDP)]
* [https://www.ams.usda.gov/datasets/pdp/pdp-standard-operating-procedures USDA Data and Instrumentation for PDP]
* [https://www.ams.usda.gov/datasets/pdp/pdp-standard-operating-procedures USDA Sample Processing and Analysis Procedures for PDP]
* [https://www.ams.usda.gov/datasets/pdp/pdp-standard-operating-procedures USDA Sampling Procedures for PDP]
* [http://venomcoding.org/ VeNom Coding Group terminology]
* [https://vtsl.vetmed.vt.edu/ Veterinary Terminology Services Laboratory terminology]
* [https://vichsec.org/en/guidelines/general VICH GL53]
* [https://extranet.who.int/prequal/content/who-technical-report-series WHO Technical Report Series, #986, Annex 2 ]


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}

Latest revision as of 19:33, 22 January 2022

Introduction and methodology

Introduction

Systems Requirement Analysis.jpg

Merriam-Webster defines a "specification" as "a detailed precise presentation of something or of a plan or proposal for something."[1] In other words, an existing or theoretical product, concept, or idea is presented in detail for a particular audience. In a broad sense, detailing the specifics about a project, concept, or idea to others is just common sense. This applies just as well to the world of software development, where a software requirements specification is essential for preventing the second most commonly cited reason for project failure: poor requirements management.[2]

In fact, the ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018 standard (a conglomeration of what was formerly IEEE 830 and other standards) is in place to help specify "the required processes implemented in the engineering activities that result in requirements for systems and software products" and provides guidelines for how to apply those requirements.[3] The standard describes the characteristics that make up quality software requirement development, including aspects such as[4]:

  • correctly describing system behavior;
  • effectively removing ambiguity from the language used;
  • completely covering the system behavior and features;
  • accurately prioritizing and ranking the requirements; and
  • unequivocally ensuring the requirements are testable, modifiable, and traceable.

A requirement typically comes in the form of a statement that begins with "the system/user/vendor shall/should ..." and focuses on a provided service, reaction to input, or expected behavior in a given situation. The statement may be abstract (high-level) or specific and detailed to a precise function. The statement may also be of a functional nature, describing functionality or services in detail, or of a non-functional nature, describing the constraints of a given functionality or service and how it's rendered. An example of a functional software requirement could be "the user shall be able to query either all of the initial set of databases or select a subset from it." This statement describes specific functionality the system should have. On the other hand, a non-functional requirement, for example, may state "the system's query tool shall conform to the ABC 123-2014 standard." The statement describes a constraint placed upon the system's query functionality. Once compiled, a set of requirements can serve not only to strengthen the software requirements specification, but the requirements set can also be used for bidding on a contract or serve as the basis for a specific contract that is being finalized.[5]

Over the years, a wide variety of companies, consultants, and researchers have compiled public and private software requirements specifications for laboratory informatics systems. These compiled lists of requirements for how a given laboratory informatics solution should be developed, delivered, and maintained have changed as technology and user demand have evolved. Often times, these requirements documents turn into a mix of "wishlist" requirements from potential and active clients, as well as regulation-mandated requirements. The wishlist items aren't necessarily ignored by developers, but they do in fact have to be prioritized as "nice to have" or "essential to system operation," or something in between.[6][7][8] While this reasonable mix of requirements has served informatics software developers well[9], sometimes a fresh approach is required.

What follows is an attempt to look less at the wishlists of laboratories and more directly at what requirements current regulatory schemes, industry standards, and organizational guidelines place on the ever-evolving array of laboratory informatics systems being developed today. What does the United States' 21 CFR Part 11 have to say about how your laboratory information management system (LIMS), laboratory information system (LIS), electronic laboratory notebook (ELN), and other systems operate? What does the European Union's Annex 11 dictate in those same regards? The following five chapters list those requirements, supported by one or more regulations, standards, and guidelines. The final chapter discusses how to best put this requirements specification to use.

Methodology

At its core, this LIMSpec—which has seen several iterations over the years—is rooted in ASTM E1578-18 Standard Guide for Laboratory Informatics. The latest version was released in 2018, which includes an updated Laboratory Informatics Functional Requirements checklist in the appendix. That list of requirements "covers functionality common to the various laboratory informatics systems discussed throughout [the] guide as well as requirements recommended as part of [the] guide." It goes on to state that the checklist "is an example of typical requirements that can be used to guide the purchase, upgrade, or development of a laboratory informatics system," though it is certainly "not meant to be exhaustive."

This LIMSpec borrows from that requirements checklist and then adds more to it from a wide variety of sources. An attempt has been made to find the most relevant regulations, standards, and guidance that shape how a compliant laboratory informatics system is developed and maintained. However, this should definitely be considered a work in progress, with more to be added with additional public and private comment on missing sources.

That said, this fourth revision (December 2022) taps into more than 130 resources, including the following:

Table 1. Regulations, standards, guidance, and other documents guiding LIMSpec development. * indicates added, updated, or revised for December 2022 update.
Regulation, Specification, or Guidance Familiar Name and/or Responsible Entity
5 CFR Part 930.301 Office of Personnel Management > Civil Service Regulations > Programs for Specific Positions and Examinations (Miscellaneous) > Information Security Responsibilities for Employees who Manage or Use Federal Information Systems > Information systems security awareness training program
7 CFR Part 91 Agricultural Marketing Service (Standards, Inspections, Marketing Practices), Department of Agriculture > Commodity Laboratory Testing Programs > Services and General Information
7 CFR Part 331 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture > Possession, Use, and Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins
9 CFR Part 2 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture > Animal Welfare > Regulations
9 CFR Part 121 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture > Viruses, Serums, Toxins, and Analogous Products; Organisms and Vectors > Possession, Use, and Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins
10 CFR Part 20 Nuclear Regulatory Commission > Standards for Protection Against Radiation
10 CFR Part 30 Nuclear Regulatory Commission > Rules of General Applicability to Domestic Licensing of Byproduct Material
21 CFR Part 1* Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > General > General Enforcement Regulations
21 CFR Part 7 Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > General > Enforcement Policy
21 CFR Part 11 Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > General > Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures
21 CFR Part 58 Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > General > Good Laboratory Practice for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies
21 CFR Part 106* Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Food for Human Consumption > Infant Formula Requirements Pertaining to Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Quality Control Procedures, Quality Factors, Records and Reports, and Notifications
21 CFR Part 110* Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Food for Human Consumption > Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packing, or Holding Human Food
21 CFR Part 111* Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Food for Human Consumption > Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packaging, Labeling, or Holding Operations for Dietary Supplements
21 CFR Part 112* Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Food for Human Consumption > Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human Consumption
21 CFR Part 114* Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Food for Human Consumption > Acidified Foods
21 CFR Part 117* Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Food for Human Consumption > Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-based Preventive Controls for Human Food
21 CFR Part 120* Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Food for Human Consumption > Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Systems
21 CFR Part 123* Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Food for Human Consumption > Fish and Fishery Products
21 CFR Part 129* Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Food for Human Consumption > Processing and Bottling of Bottled Drinking Water
21 CFR Part 211 Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Drugs: General > Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished Pharmaceuticals
21 CFR Part 212 Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Drugs: General > Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Positron Emission Tomography Drugs
21 CFR Part 225 Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Drugs: General > Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicated Feeds
21 CFR Part 226 Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Drugs: General > Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Type A Medicated Articles
21 CFR Part 312 Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Drugs for Human Use > Investigational New Drug Application
21 CFR Part 507* Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Animal Drugs, Feeds, and Related Products > Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-based Preventive Controls for Food for Animals
21 CFR Part 606 Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Biologics > Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Blood and Blood Components
21 CFR Part 810 Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Medical Devices > Medical Device Recall Authority
21 CFR Part 812 Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Medical Devices > Investigational Device Exemptions
21 CFR Part 820 Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services > Medical Devices > Quality System Regulation
29 CFR Part 1910.120 Occupational Safety and Health Standards > Hazardous Materials > Hazardous waste operations and emergency response
29 CFR Part 1910.134 Occupational Safety and Health Standards > Personal Protective Equipment > Respiratory protection
29 CFR Part 1910.1030 Occupational Safety and Health Standards > Toxic and Hazardous Substances > Bloodborne pathogens
29 CFR Part 1910.1096 Occupational Safety and Health Standards > Toxic and Hazardous Substances > Ionizing radiation
29 CFR Part 1910.1200 Occupational Safety and Health Standards > Toxic and Hazardous Substances > Hazard communication
29 CFR Part 1910.1450 Occupational Safety and Health Standards > Toxic and Hazardous Substances > Occupational exposure to hazardous chemicals in laboratories
40 CFR Part 3 Environmental Protection Agency > General > Cross-media Electronic Reporting
40 CFR Part 60 Environmental Protection Agency > Air Programs > Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources
40 CFR Part 62 Environmental Protection Agency > Air Programs > Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants
40 CFR Part 63 Environmental Protection Agency > Air Programs > National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories
40 CFR Part 141 Environmental Protection Agency > Water Programs > National Primary Drinking Water Regulations
40 CFR Part 262 Environmental Protection Agency > Solid Wastes > Standards Applicable to Generators of Hazardous Waste
40 CFR Part 370 Environmental Protection Agency > Superfund, Emergency Planning, and Community Right-to-know Programs > Hazardous Chemical Reporting: Community Right-to-know
40 CFR Part 372 Environmental Protection Agency > Superfund, Emergency Planning, and Community Right-to-know Programs > Toxic Chemical Release Reporting: Community Right-to-know
40 CFR Part 704 Environmental Protection Agency > Toxic Substances Control Act > Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements
40 CFR Part 717 Environmental Protection Agency > Toxic Substances Control Act > Records and Reports of Allegations that Chemical Substances Cause Significant Adverse Reactions to Health or the Environment
40 CFR Part 720 Environmental Protection Agency > Toxic Substances Control Act > Premanufacture Notification
42 CFR Part 73 Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services > Quarantine, Inspection, Licensing > Select Agents and Toxins
42 CFR Part 93 Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services > Health Assessments and Health Effects Studies of Hazardous Substances Releases and Facilities > Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct
42 CFR Part 493 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services > Standards and Certification > Laboratory Requirements
45 CFR Part 160 Department of Health and Human Services > Administrative Data Standards and Related Requirements > General Administrative Requirements
45 CFR Part 162 Department of Health and Human Services > Administrative Data Standards and Related Requirements > Administrative Requirements
45 CFR Part 164 Department of Health and Human Services > Administrative Data Standards and Related Requirements > Security and Privacy
45 CFR Part 170 Department of Health and Human Services > Health Information Technology > Health Information Technology Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria and Certification Programs for Health Information Technology
61 FR 38806* Food Safety and Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture > Pathogen Reduction; Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Systems
A2LA C211, Specific Checklist, Combined ISO/IEC 17025 and Veterinary Laboratory Accreditation Program American Association for Laboratory Accreditation
A2LA C223, Specific Checklist, Forensic Examination Accreditation Program-Testing American Association for Laboratory Accreditation
AAFCO QA/QC Guidelines for Feed Laboratories Association of American Feed Control Officials
AAVLD Requirements for an AVMDL American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians
ABFT Accreditation Manual American Board of Forensic Toxicology
ACMG Technical Standards for Clinical Genetics Laboratories American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
AIHA-LAP Policies 2022 American Industrial Hygiene Association Laboratory Accreditation Programs
APHL 2019 LIS Project Management Guidebook Association of Public Health Laboratories
ASCLD/LAB Supp. Reqs. for the Accreditation of Forensic Science Testing Laboratories American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board; note that ASCLD/LAB merged with ANAB (ANSI National Accreditation Board) in 2016, and their requirements for Forensic Service Provider Accreditation are not made public. As such, this serves as a proxy for ANAB.
ASTM E1188-11 ASTM E1188-11(2017) Standard Practice for Collection and Preservation of Information and Physical Items by a Technical Investigator
ASTM E1459-13 ASTM E1459-13(2018) Standard Guide for Physical Evidence Labeling and Related Documentation
ASTM E1492-11 ASTM E1492-11(2017) Standard Practice for Receiving, Documenting, Storing, and Retrieving Evidence in a Forensic Science Laboratory
ASTM E1578-18 ASTM E1578-18 Standard Guide for Laboratory Informatics
BRC GSFS, Issue 8* BRC Global Standards' Global Standard for Food Safety, Issue 8
CAP Laboratory Accreditation Manual College of American Pathologists
CDC Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL) U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CDC PHIN Messaging System U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CJIS Security Policy Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice Information Services
CLSI AUTO15 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
CLSI AUTO16 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
CLSI QMS22 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
Codex Alimentarius CXC 1-1969* Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations' Codex Alimentarius CXC 1-1969 General Principles of Good Hygiene
Codex Alimentarius CXS 193-1995* Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations' Codex Alimentarius CXS 193-1995 General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed
Codex Alimentarius CXS 234-1999* Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations' Codex Alimentarius CXS 234-1999 Recommended Methods of Analysis and Sampling
DoD General Data Validation Guidelines U.S. Department of Defense
EMA Guidance on good manufacturing practice and good distribution practice E.U. European Medicines Agency
EPA 815-R-05-004 + supplements U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPA ERLN Laboratory Requirements v1.6 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Response Laboratory Network
EPA Metadata Technical Specification U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPA QA/G-5 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans
EPA SEDD Specification and Data Element Dictionary v5.2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Staged Electronic Data Deliverable
E.U. Annex 11 European Union, European Commission
E.U. Commission Directive 2003/94/EC European Union, European Commission
E.U. Commission Reg. No. 852/2004* European Union, European Commission
E.U. Commission Reg. No. 2073/2005* European Union, European Commission
FDA Office of Regulatory Affairs Data Exchange (ORA DX) Program U.S. Food and Drug Administration
FDA Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) U.S. Food and Drug Administration
GFSI Benchmarking Rqmts., v2020.1* Global Food Safety Initiative Benchmarking Requirements Version 2020.1
ICAR 15 Data Exchange International Committee for Animal Recording
ICH GCP International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice
IFS Food 7* International Featured Standards' Food 7 Standard
IFS PACsecure 2* International Featured Standards' PACsecure 2 Standard
ISO 15189:2012 ISO 15189:2012 Medical laboratories — Requirements for quality and competence
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories
ISO/TS 22002-1:2009* ISO/TS 22002-1:2009 Prerequisite programmes on food safety — Part 1: Food manufacturing
ISO/TS 22002-4:2013* ISO/TS 22002-4:2013 Prerequisite programmes on food safety — Part 4: Food packaging manufacturing
ISO/TS 22002-6:2016* ISO/TS 22002-6:2016 Prerequisite programmes on food safety — Part 6: Feed and animal food production
NAHLN HL7 Messaging Quick User Guide National Animal Health Laboratory Network
NAHLN Information Technology System National Animal Health Laboratory Network
NYSDOH CLEP Clinical Laboratory Standards of Practice, General Systems Standards New York State Department of Health Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Program
NYSDOH ELAP Medical Marijuana Microbiology Guidance New York State Department of Health Environmental Laboratory Approval Program
NIST 800-53, Rev. 5 National Institute of Standards and Technology
OECD GLP Principles Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Good Laboratory Practice
ONC United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI) Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
OSHA 1910.1020 Occupational Safety and Health Administration 1910.1020 - Access to employee exposure and medical records
OSHA 1910.1200 Occupational Safety and Health Administration 1910.1200 - Hazard Communication
OSHA 1910.1450 Occupational Safety and Health Administration 1910.1450 - Occupational exposure to hazardous chemicals in laboratories
PFP Human and Animal Food Testing Laboratories Best Practices Manual Partnership for Food Protection
Safe Food for Canadians Regulations SOR/2018-108* Government of Canada, Governor General of Canada
SQF FSC 9, Food Manufacturing* FMI, The Food Industry Association, SQF Institute's Food Safety Code: Manufacture of Food Packaging, Ninth Edition
SQF FSC 9, Pet Food Manufacturing* FMI, The Food Industry Association, SQF Institute's Food Safety Code: Pet Food Manufacturing, Ninth Edition
SQF FSC 9, Manufacture of Food Packaging* FMI, The Food Industry Association, SQF Institute's Food Safety Code: Manufacture of Food Packaging, Ninth Edition
TNI EL-V1-2016-Rev.2.1 The NELAC Institute Management and Technical Requirements for Laboratories Performing Environmental Analysis, Volume 1
USDA Administrative Procedures for the Pesticide Data Program (PDP) U.S. Department of Agriculture
USDA Data and Instrumentation for Pesticide Data Program U.S. Department of Agriculture
USDA Hemp Production Program Laboratory Testing Guidelines U.S. Department of Agriculture
USDA Laboratory Approval Service (LAS) Laboratory Approval Program (LAP) Policies and Procedures U.S. Department of Agriculture
USDA Sample Processing and Analysis Procedures for Pesticide Data Program U.S. Department of Agriculture
USDA Sampling Procedures for Pesticide Data Program U.S. Department of Agriculture
VeNom Coding Group terminology Veterinary Nomenclature
VTSL terminology Veterinary Terminology Services Laboratory at Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine
VICH GL53 Veterinary International Conference on Harmonization GL53 Electronic Exchange of Documents: Electronic File Format
WADA International Standard for Laboratories (ISL) World Anti-Doping Agency
WADA International Standard for the Protection of Privacy and Personal Information (ISPPPI) World Anti-Doping Agency
WHO Technical Report Series, #961, Annex 13 World Health Organization TRS, #961, Annex 13 Guidelines for preparing a laboratory information file
WHO Technical Report Series, #986, Annex 2 World Health Organization TRS, #986, Annex 2 WHO good manufacturing practices for pharmaceutical products: main principles
WHO Technical Report Series, #996, Annex 5 World Health Organization TRS, #996, Annex 5 Guidance on good data and record management practices

Each requirement statement has at least one linked regulation, standard, or guidance item. In some cases, the standards covered are proprietary. In those cases, the standard was either purchased for review or heavily researched using supporting documentation, and the link goes to the acquisition page for the standard. In other cases, some sources have been intentionally omitted. For example, the AOAC International Official Methods of Analysis and Guidelines for Laboratories Performing Microbiological and Chemical Analyses of Food, Dietary Supplements, and Pharmaceuticals are both proprietary and more or less prohibitively expensive. In other cases, such as with the U.S. Food Emergency Response Network and Laboratory Response Network, they simply don't make their standardized procedures open to the public and thus can't be included.

References

  1. "specification". Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster, Inc. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/specification. Retrieved 07 December 2022. 
  2. Bieg, D.P. (August 2014). "Introduction" (PDF). Requirements Management: A Core Competency for Project and Program Success. Project Management Institute. p. 3. https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/requirements-management.pdf. Retrieved 07 December 2022. 
  3. "ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018". International Organization for Standardization. November 2018. https://www.iso.org/standard/72089.html. Retrieved 07 December 2022. 
  4. Seibert, P. (28 July 2011). "How do you write software requirements? What are software requirements? What is a software requirement?". HubTechInsider. https://hubtechinsider.wordpress.com/2011/07/28/how-do-you-write-software-requirements-what-are-software-requirements-what-is-a-software-requirement/. Retrieved 07 December 2022. 
  5. Memon, A. (Spring 2010). "Software Requirements: Descriptions and specifications of a system" (PDF). University of Maryland. https://www.cs.umd.edu/~atif/Teaching/Spring2010/Slides/3.pdf. Retrieved 07 December 2022. 
  6. Aasem, M.; Ramzan, M.; Jaffar, A. (2010). "Analysis and optimization of software requirements prioritization techniques". Proceedings from the 2010 International Conference on Information and Emerging Technologies: 1–6. doi:10.1109/ICIET.2010.5625687. 
  7. Hirsch, J. (22 November 2013). "10 Steps To Successful Requirements Gathering". Phase2 Technology, LLC. https://www.phase2technology.com/blog/successful-requirements-gathering. Retrieved 07 December 2022. 
  8. Burris, E. (2007). "Requirements Specification". CS451R, University of Missouri–Kansas City. University of Missouri–Kansas City. Archived from the original on 24 July 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190724173601/http://sce2.umkc.edu/BIT/burrise/pl/requirements/. Retrieved 07 December 2022. 
  9. Hofmann, H.F.; Lehner, F. (2001). "Requirements engineering as a success factor in software projects". IEEE Software 18 (4): 58–66. doi:10.1109/MS.2001.936219.