Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text.)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Garza BMCBioinformatics2016 17.gif|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Cervin JofPathInfo2016 7.jpg|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:From the desktop to the grid: Scalable bioinformatics via workflow conversion|From the desktop to the grid: Scalable bioinformatics via workflow conversion]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Improving the creation and reporting of structured findings during digital pathology review|Improving the creation and reporting of structured findings during digital pathology review]]"'''


Reproducibility is one of the tenets of the [[scientific method]]. Scientific experiments often comprise complex data flows, selection of adequate parameters, and analysis and visualization of intermediate and end results. Breaking down the complexity of such experiments into the joint collaboration of small, repeatable, well defined tasks, each with well defined inputs, parameters, and outputs, offers the immediate benefit of identifying bottlenecks, pinpoint sections which could benefit from parallelization, among others. [[Workflow]]s rest upon the notion of splitting complex work into the joint effort of several manageable tasks.
Today, pathology reporting consists of many separate tasks, carried out by multiple people. Common tasks include dictation during case review, transcription, verification of the transcription, report distribution, and reporting the key findings to follow-up registries. Introduction of digital workstations makes it possible to remove some of these tasks and simplify others. This study describes the work presented at the Nordic Symposium on Digital Pathology 2015, in Linköping, Sweden.  


There are several engines that give users the ability to design and execute workflows. Each engine was created to address certain problems of a specific community, therefore each one has its advantages and shortcomings. Furthermore, not all features of all workflow engines are royalty-free — an aspect that could potentially drive away members of the scientific community. ('''[[Journal:From the desktop to the grid: Scalable bioinformatics via workflow conversion|Full article...]]''')<br />
We explored the possibility of having a digital tool that simplifies image review by assisting note-taking, and with minimal extra effort, populates a structured report. Thus, our prototype sees reporting as an activity interleaved with image review rather than a separate final step. We created an interface to collect, sort, and display findings for the most common reporting needs, such as tumor size, grading, and scoring. ('''[[Journal:Improving the creation and reporting of structured findings during digital pathology review|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':  
''Recently featured'':  
: ▪ [[Journal:From the desktop to the grid: Scalable bioinformatics via workflow conversion|From the desktop to the grid: Scalable bioinformatics via workflow conversion]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Terminology spectrum analysis of natural-language chemical documents: Term-like phrases retrieval routine|Terminology spectrum analysis of natural-language chemical documents: Term-like phrases retrieval routine]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Terminology spectrum analysis of natural-language chemical documents: Term-like phrases retrieval routine|Terminology spectrum analysis of natural-language chemical documents: Term-like phrases retrieval routine]]
: ▪ [[Journal:A legal framework to support development and assessment of digital health services|A legal framework to support development and assessment of digital health services]]
: ▪ [[Journal:A legal framework to support development and assessment of digital health services|A legal framework to support development and assessment of digital health services]]
: ▪ [[Journal:The GAAIN Entity Mapper: An active-learning system for medical data mapping|The GAAIN Entity Mapper: An active-learning system for medical data mapping]]

Revision as of 15:03, 22 August 2016

Fig1 Cervin JofPathInfo2016 7.jpg

"Improving the creation and reporting of structured findings during digital pathology review"

Today, pathology reporting consists of many separate tasks, carried out by multiple people. Common tasks include dictation during case review, transcription, verification of the transcription, report distribution, and reporting the key findings to follow-up registries. Introduction of digital workstations makes it possible to remove some of these tasks and simplify others. This study describes the work presented at the Nordic Symposium on Digital Pathology 2015, in Linköping, Sweden.

We explored the possibility of having a digital tool that simplifies image review by assisting note-taking, and with minimal extra effort, populates a structured report. Thus, our prototype sees reporting as an activity interleaved with image review rather than a separate final step. We created an interface to collect, sort, and display findings for the most common reporting needs, such as tumor size, grading, and scoring. (Full article...)

Recently featured:

From the desktop to the grid: Scalable bioinformatics via workflow conversion
Terminology spectrum analysis of natural-language chemical documents: Term-like phrases retrieval routine
A legal framework to support development and assessment of digital health services