Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
m (Image)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Tab3 Brandão Information2016 7-4.png|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Hester DataSciJourn2016 15.png|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:A robust, format-agnostic scientific data transfer framework|A robust, format-agnostic scientific data transfer framework]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:A robust, format-agnostic scientific data transfer framework|A robust, format-agnostic scientific data transfer framework]]"'''



Revision as of 20:34, 16 January 2017

Fig1 Hester DataSciJourn2016 15.png

"A robust, format-agnostic scientific data transfer framework"

The olog approach of Spivak and Kent is applied to the practical development of data transfer frameworks, yielding simple rules for construction and assessment of data transfer standards. The simplicity, extensibility and modularity of such descriptions allows discipline experts unfamiliar with complex ontological constructs or toolsets to synthesize multiple pre-existing standards, potentially including a variety of file formats, into a single overarching ontology. These ontologies nevertheless capture all scientifically-relevant prior knowledge, and when expressed in machine-readable form are sufficiently expressive to mediate translation between legacy and modern data formats. A format-independent programming interface informed by this ontology consists of six functions, of which only two handle data. Demonstration software implementing this interface is used to translate between two common diffraction image formats using such an ontology in place of an intermediate format. (Full article...)

Recently featured:

A benchmarking analysis of open-source business intelligence tools in healthcare environments
openBIS ELN-LIMS: An open-source database for academic laboratories
Health literacy and health information technology adoption: The potential for a new digital divide