Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text.)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''"[[Journal:Global data quality assessment and the situated nature of “best” research practices in biology|Global data quality assessment and the situated nature of “best” research practices in biology]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Bioinformatics: Indispensable, yet hidden in plain sight|Bioinformatics: Indispensable, yet hidden in plain sight]]"'''


This paper reflects on the relation between international debates around data quality assessment and the diversity characterizing research practices, goals and environments within the life sciences. Since the emergence of molecular approaches, many biologists have focused their research, and related methods and instruments for data production, on the study of genes and genomes. While this trend is now shifting, prominent institutions and companies with stakes in molecular biology continue to set standards for what counts as "good science" worldwide, resulting in the use of specific data production technologies as proxy for assessing data quality. This is problematic considering (1) the variability in research cultures, goals and the very characteristics of biological systems, which can give rise to countless different approaches to knowledge production; and (2) the existence of research environments that produce high-quality, significant datasets despite not availing themselves of the latest technologies. Ethnographic research carried out in such environments evidences a widespread fear among researchers that providing extensive information about their experimental set-up will affect the perceived quality of their data, making their findings vulnerable to criticisms by better-resourced peers. These fears can make scientists resistant to sharing data or describing their provenance. ('''[[Journal:Global data quality assessment and the situated nature of “best” research practices in biology|Full article...]]''')<br />
[[Bioinformatics]] has multitudinous identities, organizational alignments and disciplinary links. This variety allows bioinformaticians and bioinformatic work to contribute to much (if not most) of life science research in profound ways. The multitude of bioinformatic work also translates into a multitude of credit-distribution arrangements, apparently dismissing that work.
 
We report on the epistemic and social arrangements that characterize the relationship between bioinformatics and life science. We describe, in sociological terms, the character, power and future of bioinformatic work. The character of bioinformatic work is such that its cultural, institutional and technical structures allow for it to be black-boxed easily. The result is that bioinformatic expertise and contributions travel easily and quickly, yet remain largely uncredited. The power of bioinformatic work is shaped by its dependency on life science work, which combined with the black-boxed character of bioinformatic expertise further contributes to situating bioinformatics on the periphery of the life sciences. Finally, the imagined futures of bioinformatic work suggest that bioinformatics will become ever more indispensable without necessarily becoming more visible, forcing bioinformaticians into difficult professional and career choices. ('''[[Journal:Bioinformatics: Indispensable, yet hidden in plain sight|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':  
''Recently featured'':  
: ▪ [[Journal:Global data quality assessment and the situated nature of “best” research practices in biology|Global data quality assessment and the situated nature of “best” research practices in biology]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Neuroimaging, genetics, and clinical data sharing in Python using the CubicWeb framework|Neuroimaging, genetics, and clinical data sharing in Python using the CubicWeb framework]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Neuroimaging, genetics, and clinical data sharing in Python using the CubicWeb framework|Neuroimaging, genetics, and clinical data sharing in Python using the CubicWeb framework]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Analyzing the field of bioinformatics with the multi-faceted topic modeling technique|Analyzing the field of bioinformatics with the multi-faceted topic modeling technique]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Analyzing the field of bioinformatics with the multi-faceted topic modeling technique|Analyzing the field of bioinformatics with the multi-faceted topic modeling technique]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Intervene: A tool for intersection and visualization of multiple gene or genomic region sets|Intervene: A tool for intersection and visualization of multiple gene or genomic region sets]]

Revision as of 15:53, 28 August 2017

"Bioinformatics: Indispensable, yet hidden in plain sight"

Bioinformatics has multitudinous identities, organizational alignments and disciplinary links. This variety allows bioinformaticians and bioinformatic work to contribute to much (if not most) of life science research in profound ways. The multitude of bioinformatic work also translates into a multitude of credit-distribution arrangements, apparently dismissing that work.

We report on the epistemic and social arrangements that characterize the relationship between bioinformatics and life science. We describe, in sociological terms, the character, power and future of bioinformatic work. The character of bioinformatic work is such that its cultural, institutional and technical structures allow for it to be black-boxed easily. The result is that bioinformatic expertise and contributions travel easily and quickly, yet remain largely uncredited. The power of bioinformatic work is shaped by its dependency on life science work, which combined with the black-boxed character of bioinformatic expertise further contributes to situating bioinformatics on the periphery of the life sciences. Finally, the imagined futures of bioinformatic work suggest that bioinformatics will become ever more indispensable without necessarily becoming more visible, forcing bioinformaticians into difficult professional and career choices. (Full article...)

Recently featured:

Global data quality assessment and the situated nature of “best” research practices in biology
Neuroimaging, genetics, and clinical data sharing in Python using the CubicWeb framework
Analyzing the field of bioinformatics with the multi-faceted topic modeling technique