Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text.)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig3 Martin LIBER2017 27-1.jpg|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Tab2 Matthews JPathInfo2017 8.jpg|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Data management: New tools, new organization, and new skills in a French research institute|Data management: New tools, new organization, and new skills in a French research institute]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Usability evaluation of laboratory information systems|Usability evaluation of laboratory information systems]]"'''


In the context of e-science and open access, visibility and impact of scientific results and data have become important aspects for spreading [[information]] to users and to the society in general. The objective of this general trend of the economy is to feed the innovation process and create economic value. In our institute, the French National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture, Irstea, the department in charge of scientific and technical information, with the help of other professionals (scientists, IT professionals, ethics advisors, etc.), has recently developed suitable services for researchers and their data management needs in order to answer European recommendations for open data. This situation has demanded a review of the different workflows between databases, questioning the organizational aspects among skills, occupations, and departments in the institute. In fact, data management involves all professionals and researchers assessing their workflows together. ('''[[Journal:Data management: New tools, new organization, and new skills in a French research institute|Full article...]]''')<br />
Numerous studies have revealed widespread clinician frustration with the usability of [[electronic health record]]s (EHRs) that is counterproductive to adoption of EHR systems to meet the aims of healthcare reform. With poor system usability comes increased risk of negative unintended consequences. Usability issues could lead to user error and workarounds that have the potential to compromise patient safety and negatively impact the quality of care. While there is ample research on EHR usability, there is little [[information]] on the usability of [[laboratory information system]]s (LIS). Yet, an LIS facilitates the timely provision of a great deal of the information needed by physicians to make patient care decisions. Medical and technical advances in genomics that require processing of an increased volume of complex [[laboratory]] data further underscore the importance of developing a user-friendly LIS. This study aims to add to the body of knowledge on LIS usability. ('''[[Journal:Usability evaluation of laboratory information systems|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':  
''Recently featured'':  
: ▪ [[Journal:Data management: New tools, new organization, and new skills in a French research institute|Data management: New tools, new organization, and new skills in a French research institute]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Comprehending the health informatics spectrum: Grappling with system entropy and advancing quality clinical research|Comprehending the health informatics spectrum: Grappling with system entropy and advancing quality clinical research]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Comprehending the health informatics spectrum: Grappling with system entropy and advancing quality clinical research|Comprehending the health informatics spectrum: Grappling with system entropy and advancing quality clinical research]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Energy informatics: Fundamentals and standardization|Energy informatics: Fundamentals and standardization]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Energy informatics: Fundamentals and standardization|Energy informatics: Fundamentals and standardization]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Electronic laboratory notebooks in a public–private partnership|Electronic laboratory notebooks in a public–private partnership]]

Revision as of 16:42, 4 December 2017

Tab2 Matthews JPathInfo2017 8.jpg

"Usability evaluation of laboratory information systems"

Numerous studies have revealed widespread clinician frustration with the usability of electronic health records (EHRs) that is counterproductive to adoption of EHR systems to meet the aims of healthcare reform. With poor system usability comes increased risk of negative unintended consequences. Usability issues could lead to user error and workarounds that have the potential to compromise patient safety and negatively impact the quality of care. While there is ample research on EHR usability, there is little information on the usability of laboratory information systems (LIS). Yet, an LIS facilitates the timely provision of a great deal of the information needed by physicians to make patient care decisions. Medical and technical advances in genomics that require processing of an increased volume of complex laboratory data further underscore the importance of developing a user-friendly LIS. This study aims to add to the body of knowledge on LIS usability. (Full article...)

Recently featured:

Data management: New tools, new organization, and new skills in a French research institute
Comprehending the health informatics spectrum: Grappling with system entropy and advancing quality clinical research
Energy informatics: Fundamentals and standardization