Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text.)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''"[[Journal:A review of the role of public health informatics in healthcare|A review of the role of public health informatics in healthcare]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Compliance culture or culture change? The role of funders in improving data management and sharing practice amongst researchers|Compliance culture or culture change? The role of funders in improving data management and sharing practice amongst researchers]]"'''
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig2 Neylon ResIdeasOut2017 3.jpg|240px]]</div>
There is a wide and growing interest in promoting research data management (RDM) and research data sharing (RDS) from many stakeholders in the research enterprise. Funders are under pressure from activists, from government, and from the wider public agenda towards greater transparency and access to encourage, require, and deliver improved data practices from the researchers they fund.


Recognized as information intensive, healthcare requires timely, accurate information from many different sources generated by health information systems (HIS). With the availability of information technology in today's world and its integration in healthcare systems, the term “[[public health informatics]] (PHI)” was coined and used. The main focus of PHI is the use of information science and technology for promoting population health rather than individual health. PHI has a disease prevention rather than treatment focus in order to prevent a chain of events that leads to a disease's spread. Moreover, PHI often operates at the government level rather than in the private sector. This review article provides an overview of the field of PHI and compares paper-based surveillance system and public health information networks (PHIN). The current trends and future challenges of applying PHI systems in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) were also reported. ('''[[Journal:A review of the role of public health informatics in healthcare|Full article...]]''')<br />
Funders are responding to this, and to their own interest in improved practice, by developing and implementing policies on RDM and RDS. In this review we examine the state of funder policies, the process of implementation and available guidance to identify the challenges and opportunities for funders in developing policy and delivering on the aspirations for improved community practice, greater transparency and engagement, and enhanced impact. ('''[[Journal:Compliance culture or culture change? The role of funders in improving data management and sharing practice amongst researchers|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':  
''Recently featured'':  
: ▪ [[Journal:A review of the role of public health informatics in healthcare|A review of the role of public health informatics in healthcare]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Preferred names, preferred pronouns, and gender identity in the electronic medical record and laboratory information system: Is pathology ready?|Preferred names, preferred pronouns, and gender identity in the electronic medical record and laboratory information system: Is pathology ready?]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Preferred names, preferred pronouns, and gender identity in the electronic medical record and laboratory information system: Is pathology ready?|Preferred names, preferred pronouns, and gender identity in the electronic medical record and laboratory information system: Is pathology ready?]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Experimental application of business process management technology to manage clinical pathways: A pediatric kidney transplantation follow-up case|Experimental application of business process management technology to manage clinical pathways: A pediatric kidney transplantation follow-up case]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Experimental application of business process management technology to manage clinical pathways: A pediatric kidney transplantation follow-up case|Experimental application of business process management technology to manage clinical pathways: A pediatric kidney transplantation follow-up case]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Expert search strategies: The information retrieval practices of healthcare information professionals|Expert search strategies: The information retrieval practices of healthcare information professionals]]

Revision as of 16:58, 30 January 2018

"Compliance culture or culture change? The role of funders in improving data management and sharing practice amongst researchers"

Fig2 Neylon ResIdeasOut2017 3.jpg

There is a wide and growing interest in promoting research data management (RDM) and research data sharing (RDS) from many stakeholders in the research enterprise. Funders are under pressure from activists, from government, and from the wider public agenda towards greater transparency and access to encourage, require, and deliver improved data practices from the researchers they fund.

Funders are responding to this, and to their own interest in improved practice, by developing and implementing policies on RDM and RDS. In this review we examine the state of funder policies, the process of implementation and available guidance to identify the challenges and opportunities for funders in developing policy and delivering on the aspirations for improved community practice, greater transparency and engagement, and enhanced impact. (Full article...)

Recently featured:

▪ A review of the role of public health informatics in healthcare
▪ Preferred names, preferred pronouns, and gender identity in the electronic medical record and laboratory information system: Is pathology ready?
▪ Experimental application of business process management technology to manage clinical pathways: A pediatric kidney transplantation follow-up case
Retrieved from "https://www.limswiki.org/index.php?title=Template:Article_of_the_week&oldid=32502"