Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text)
(34 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig5 Kayser TechInnoManRev2018 8-3.png|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Duncan FrontBioengBiotech2019 7.jpg|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Data science as an innovation challenge: From big data to value proposition|Data science as an innovation challenge: From big data to value proposition]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Cyberbiosecurity: A new perspective on protecting U.S. food and agricultural system|Cyberbiosecurity: A new perspective on protecting U.S. food and agricultural system]]"'''


Analyzing “big data” holds huge potential for generating business value. The ongoing advancement of tools and technology over recent years has created a new ecosystem full of opportunities for data-driven innovation. However, as the amount of available data rises to new heights, so too does complexity. Organizations are challenged to create the right contexts, by shaping interfaces and processes, and by asking the right questions to guide the [[data analysis]]. Lifting the innovation potential requires teaming and focus to efficiently assign available resources to the most promising initiatives. With reference to the innovation process, this article will concentrate on establishing a process for analytics projects from first ideas to realization (in most cases, a running application). The question we tackle is: what can the practical discourse on big data and analytics learn from innovation management? ('''[[Journal:Data science as an innovation challenge: From big data to value proposition|Full article...]]''')<br />
Our national data and infrastructure security issues affecting the “bioeconomy” are evolving rapidly. Simultaneously, the conversation about cybersecurity of the U.S. [[Agriculture industry|food and agricultural system]] (cyber biosecurity) is incomplete and disjointed. The food and agricultural production sectors influence over 20% of the nation's economy ($6.7T) and 15% of U.S. employment (43.3M jobs). The food and agricultural sectors are immensely diverse, and they require advanced technologies and efficiencies that rely on computer technologies, big data, [[Cloud computing|cloud-based]] data storage, and internet accessibility. There is a critical need to safeguard the cyber biosecurity of our bioeconomy, but currently protections are minimal and do not broadly exist across the food and agricultural system. Using the food safety management Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) system concept as an introductory point of reference, we identify important features in broad food and agricultural production and food systems: dairy, food animals, row crops, fruits and vegetables, and environmental resources (water). ('''[[Journal:Cyberbiosecurity: A new perspective on protecting U.S. food and agricultural system|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':
: ▪ [[Journal:The development of data science: Implications for education, employment, research, and the data revolution for sustainable development|The development of data science: Implications for education, employment, research, and the data revolution for sustainable development]]
: ▪ [[Journal:DAQUA-MASS: An ISO 8000-61-based data quality management methodology for sensor data|DAQUA-MASS: An ISO 8000-61-based data quality management methodology for sensor data]]
: ▪ [[Journal:GeoFIS: An open-source decision support tool for precision agriculture data|GeoFIS: An open-source decision support tool for precision agriculture data]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Security architecture and protocol for trust verifications regarding the integrity of files stored in cloud services|Security architecture and protocol for trust verifications regarding the integrity of files stored in cloud services]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Technology transfer and true transformation: Implications for open data|Technology transfer and true transformation: Implications for open data]]
: ▪ [[Journal:What Is health information quality? Ethical dimension and perception by users|What Is health information quality? Ethical dimension and perception by users]]

Revision as of 16:29, 20 May 2019

Fig1 Duncan FrontBioengBiotech2019 7.jpg

"Cyberbiosecurity: A new perspective on protecting U.S. food and agricultural system"

Our national data and infrastructure security issues affecting the “bioeconomy” are evolving rapidly. Simultaneously, the conversation about cybersecurity of the U.S. food and agricultural system (cyber biosecurity) is incomplete and disjointed. The food and agricultural production sectors influence over 20% of the nation's economy ($6.7T) and 15% of U.S. employment (43.3M jobs). The food and agricultural sectors are immensely diverse, and they require advanced technologies and efficiencies that rely on computer technologies, big data, cloud-based data storage, and internet accessibility. There is a critical need to safeguard the cyber biosecurity of our bioeconomy, but currently protections are minimal and do not broadly exist across the food and agricultural system. Using the food safety management Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) system concept as an introductory point of reference, we identify important features in broad food and agricultural production and food systems: dairy, food animals, row crops, fruits and vegetables, and environmental resources (water). (Full article...)

Recently featured:

DAQUA-MASS: An ISO 8000-61-based data quality management methodology for sensor data
Security architecture and protocol for trust verifications regarding the integrity of files stored in cloud services
What Is health information quality? Ethical dimension and perception by users