Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text)
(34 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''"[[Journal:Support Your Data: A research data management guide for researchers|Support Your Data: A research data management guide for researchers]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Defending our public biological databases as a global critical infrastructure|Defending our public biological databases as a global critical infrastructure]]"'''


Researchers are faced with rapidly evolving expectations about how they should manage and share their data, code, and other [[research]] materials. To help them meet these expectations and generally manage and share their data more effectively, we are developing a suite of tools which we are currently referring to as "Support Your Data." These tools— which include a rubric designed to enable researchers to self-assess their current [[Information management|data management]] practices and a series of short guides which provide actionable [[information]] about how to advance practices as necessary or desired—are intended to be easily customizable to meet the needs of researchers working in a variety of institutional and disciplinary contexts. ('''[[Journal:Support Your Data: A research data management guide for researchers|Full article...]]''')<br />
Progress in modern biology is being driven, in part, by the large amounts of freely available data in public resources such as the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC), the world's primary database of biological sequence (and related) [[information]]. INSDC and similar databases have dramatically increased the pace of fundamental biological discovery and enabled a host of innovative therapeutic, diagnostic, and forensic applications. However, as high-value, openly shared resources with a high degree of assumed trust, these repositories share compelling similarities to the early days of the internet. Consequently, as public biological databases continue to increase in size and importance, we expect that they will face the same threats as undefended cyberspace. There is a unique opportunity, before a significant breach and loss of trust occurs, to ensure they evolve with quality and security as a design philosophy rather than costly “retrofitted” mitigations. This perspective article surveys some potential quality assurance and security weaknesses in existing open [[Genomics|genomic]] and [[Proteomics|proteomic]] repositories, describes methods to mitigate the likelihood of both intentional and unintentional errors, and offers recommendations for risk mitigation based on lessons learned from [[cybersecurity]]. ('''[[Journal:Defending our public biological databases as a global critical infrastructure|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':
: ▪ [[Journal:CÆLIS: Software for assimilation, management, and processing data of an atmospheric measurement network|CÆLIS: Software for assimilation, management, and processing data of an atmospheric measurement network]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Determining the hospital information system (HIS) success rate: Development of a new instrument and case study|Determining the hospital information system (HIS) success rate: Development of a new instrument and case study]]
: ▪ [[Journal:How could the ethical management of health data in the medical field inform police use of DNA?|How could the ethical management of health data in the medical field inform police use of DNA?]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Smart information systems in cybersecurity: An ethical analysis|Smart information systems in cybersecurity: An ethical analysis]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Big data in the era of health information exchanges: Challenges and opportunities for public health|Big data in the era of health information exchanges: Challenges and opportunities for public health]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Chemometric analysis of cannabinoids: Chemotaxonomy and domestication syndrome|Chemometric analysis of cannabinoids: Chemotaxonomy and domestication syndrome]]

Revision as of 15:16, 23 July 2019

"Defending our public biological databases as a global critical infrastructure"

Progress in modern biology is being driven, in part, by the large amounts of freely available data in public resources such as the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC), the world's primary database of biological sequence (and related) information. INSDC and similar databases have dramatically increased the pace of fundamental biological discovery and enabled a host of innovative therapeutic, diagnostic, and forensic applications. However, as high-value, openly shared resources with a high degree of assumed trust, these repositories share compelling similarities to the early days of the internet. Consequently, as public biological databases continue to increase in size and importance, we expect that they will face the same threats as undefended cyberspace. There is a unique opportunity, before a significant breach and loss of trust occurs, to ensure they evolve with quality and security as a design philosophy rather than costly “retrofitted” mitigations. This perspective article surveys some potential quality assurance and security weaknesses in existing open genomic and proteomic repositories, describes methods to mitigate the likelihood of both intentional and unintentional errors, and offers recommendations for risk mitigation based on lessons learned from cybersecurity. (Full article...)

Recently featured:

Determining the hospital information system (HIS) success rate: Development of a new instrument and case study
Smart information systems in cybersecurity: An ethical analysis
Chemometric analysis of cannabinoids: Chemotaxonomy and domestication syndrome