Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text)
(Updated article of the week text)
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Tab2 Valdes-Donoso CaliforniaAg2019 73-3.jpg|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig0 Cardenia JofFoodDrugAnal2018 26-4.jpg|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Costs of mandatory cannabis testing in California|Costs of mandatory cannabis testing in California]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Development and validation of a fast gas chromatography–mass spectrometry method for the determination of cannabinoids in Cannabis sativa L|Development and validation of a fast gas chromatography–mass spectrometry method for the determination of cannabinoids in Cannabis sativa L]]"'''


Every batch of [[wikipedia:Cannabis|cannabis]] sold legally in California must be tested for more than 100 contaminants. These contaminants include 66 pesticides, for 21 of which the state's tolerance is zero. For many other substances, tolerance levels are much lower than those allowed for food products in California. This article reviews the state's testing [[Regulatory compliance|regulations]] in context—including maximum allowable tolerance levels—and uses primary data collected from California's major cannabis testing [[Laboratory|laboratories]] and several cannabis testing equipment manufacturers, as well as a variety of expert opinions, to estimate the cost per pound of testing under the state's framework. We also estimate the cost of collecting [[Sample (material)|samples]], which depends on the distance between cannabis distributors and laboratories. We find that, if a batch fails mandatory tests, the value of cannabis that must be destroyed accounts for a large share of total testing costs, more than the cost of the tests that laboratories perform. Findings from this article will help readers understand the effects of California's testing regime on the price of legal cannabis in the state, and understand how testing may add value to products that have passed a series of tests that aim to validate their safety. ('''[[Journal:Costs of mandatory cannabis testing in California|Full article...]]''')<br />
A routine method for determining [[wikipedia:Cannabinoid|cannabinoids]] in ''Cannabis sativa'' L. [[wikipedia:Inflorescence|inflorescence]], based on fast [[gas chromatography]] coupled to [[mass spectrometry]] (fast GC-MS), was developed and validated. To avoid the [[wikipedia:Decarboxylation|decarboxylation]] of the carboxyl group of cannabinoids, different derivatization approaches—i.e., silylation and esterification (diazomethane-mediated) reagents and solvents (pyridine or ethyl acetate)—were tested. The methylation significantly increased the signal-to-noise ratio of all carboxylic cannabinoids, except for cannabigerolic acid (CBGA). Since [[wikipedia:Diazomethane|diazomethane]] is not commercially available, is considered a hazardous reactive, and requires one-day synthesis by specialized chemical staff, the process of silylation was used along the entire validation of a routine method. The method gave a fast (total analysis time < 7.0 min) and satisfactory resolution (R > 1.1), with a good repeatability (intraday < 8.38%; interday < 11.10%) and sensitivity (LOD < 11.20 ng/mL). ('''[[Journal:Development and validation of a fast gas chromatography–mass spectrometry method for the determination of cannabinoids in Cannabis sativa L|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':
: ▪ [[Journal:An integrated data analytics platform|An integrated data analytics platform]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Design and refinement of a data quality assessment workflow for a large pediatric research network|Design and refinement of a data quality assessment workflow for a large pediatric research network]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Virtualization-based security techniques on mobile cloud computing: Research gaps and challenges|Virtualization-based security techniques on mobile cloud computing: Research gaps and challenges]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Identification of Cannabis sativa L. (hemp) retailers by means of multivariate analysis of cannabinoids|Identification of Cannabis sativa L. (hemp) retailers by means of multivariate analysis of cannabinoids]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Building open access to research (OAR) data infrastructure at NIST|Building open access to research (OAR) data infrastructure at NIST]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Data sharing at scale: A heuristic for affirming data cultures|Data sharing at scale: A heuristic for affirming data cultures]]

Revision as of 17:13, 9 December 2019

Fig0 Cardenia JofFoodDrugAnal2018 26-4.jpg

"Development and validation of a fast gas chromatography–mass spectrometry method for the determination of cannabinoids in Cannabis sativa L"

A routine method for determining cannabinoids in Cannabis sativa L. inflorescence, based on fast gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (fast GC-MS), was developed and validated. To avoid the decarboxylation of the carboxyl group of cannabinoids, different derivatization approaches—i.e., silylation and esterification (diazomethane-mediated) reagents and solvents (pyridine or ethyl acetate)—were tested. The methylation significantly increased the signal-to-noise ratio of all carboxylic cannabinoids, except for cannabigerolic acid (CBGA). Since diazomethane is not commercially available, is considered a hazardous reactive, and requires one-day synthesis by specialized chemical staff, the process of silylation was used along the entire validation of a routine method. The method gave a fast (total analysis time < 7.0 min) and satisfactory resolution (R > 1.1), with a good repeatability (intraday < 8.38%; interday < 11.10%) and sensitivity (LOD < 11.20 ng/mL). (Full article...)

Recently featured:

Design and refinement of a data quality assessment workflow for a large pediatric research network
Identification of Cannabis sativa L. (hemp) retailers by means of multivariate analysis of cannabinoids
Data sharing at scale: A heuristic for affirming data cultures