Difference between revisions of "Template:Or/doc"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (1 revision)
 
(Updated text.)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
:'''Warning: this is ''NOT'' the same as {{tl|OR}}...'''-->
:'''Warning: this is ''NOT'' the same as {{tl|OR}}...'''-->


This template tag will categorise tagged articles into [[:Category:Articles that may contain original research]] but not this template itself. This [[Wikipedia:Template messages|template]] is a [[Wikipedia:Avoid self-references|self-reference]] and so is part of the Wikipedia project rather than the encyclopedic content.
This template tag will categorise tagged articles into [[:Category:Articles that may contain original research]] but not this template itself. This template is a self-reference and so is part of the LIMSwiki project rather than the wiki content.


The intention of this tag is to ''nudge'' fellow editors who may inadvertently (or otherwise) introduce text that ''appears'' based upon original research, into supporting such text through demonstrating its previously researched origins. This tag provides a ''good faith'' means for editors to allow given text of fellow editors to remain ''temporarily'' in a given article until such time as the text's previously researched origins are supported. In the event that researched origins for the text are not produced after a relatively small passage of time (ie: no more than a few days), the tagging editor would generally be right in assuming that it could be edited or otherwise removed from the article to comply with [[Wikipedia:No original research]]. When a given editor adds this template he or she must concurrently add corresponding text to the tagged article's talk page to explain their concerns relative to original research for the given tagged text unless talk already exists relative to such concerns. If a given article has been tagged and the tagging editor doesn't ensure that corresponding article talk relative to the tag isn't either already available or added within a short amount of time (ie: no more than 24 hours) then fellow editors are within their rights to remove the tag or alternatively, add talk in support of its use.
The intention of this tag is to ''nudge'' fellow editors who may inadvertently (or otherwise) introduce text that ''appears'' based upon original research, into supporting such text through demonstrating its previously researched origins. This tag provides a ''good faith'' means for editors to allow given text of fellow editors to remain ''temporarily'' in a given article until such time as the text's previously researched origins are supported. In the event that researched origins for the text are not produced after a relatively small passage of time (ie: no more than a few days), the tagging editor would generally be right in assuming that it could be edited or otherwise removed from the article to comply with [[Wikipedia:No original research]]. When a given editor adds this template he or she must concurrently add corresponding text to the tagged article's talk page to explain their concerns relative to original research for the given tagged text unless talk already exists relative to such concerns. If a given article has been tagged and the tagging editor doesn't ensure that corresponding article talk relative to the tag isn't either already available or added within a short amount of time (ie: no more than 24 hours) then fellow editors are within their rights to remove the tag or alternatively, add talk in support of its use.
Line 9: Line 9:
=== Usage ===
=== Usage ===
  <nowiki>{{or |date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki>
  <nowiki>{{or |date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki>
:This template's usage is simple, after a passage of text in a given article that appears to be [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]] one simply tacks on <nowiki>{{or}}</nowiki> to specify that particular passage as likely being of questionable origin. '''Do not forget''' to ensure that there is corresponding article talk to explain one's usage of this tag.  
:This template's usage is simple, after a passage of text in a given article that appears to be original research one simply tacks on <nowiki>{{or}}</nowiki> to specify that particular passage as likely being of questionable origin. '''Do not forget''' to ensure that there is corresponding article talk to explain one's usage of this tag.  
::For example in the original article the following text may appear:
::For example in the original article the following text may appear:
:::*Based upon the theories of some ancient religious scholars the world is indeed flat.  
:::*Based upon the theories of some ancient religious scholars the world is indeed flat.  
::To mark this particular passage merely edit in <nowiki>{{or}}</nowiki> at the end of "flat." so that it will appear in this way:
::To mark this particular passage merely edit in <nowiki>{{or}}</nowiki> at the end of "flat." so that it will appear in this way:
:::*Based upon the theories of some ancient religious scholars the world is indeed flat.<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>''[[Wikipedia:No original research|original research?]]''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup>
:::*Based upon the theories of some ancient religious scholars the world is indeed flat.<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>''original research?''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup>


Do not use this tag to label text which appears false or doubtful, '''especially''' in the case of [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|biographies of living people]] (see [[Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule#Reverting_potentially_libellous_material|this section of WP:3RR]] as well). In the case of text that appears false or doubtful and is not part of a biography of a living person then move such text to the discussion page and ask for citations of previous research there, otherwise '''remove it'''.
Do not use this tag to label text which appears false or doubtful, '''especially''' in the case of biographies of living people. In the case of text that appears false or doubtful and is not part of a biography of a living person then move such text to the discussion page and ask for citations of previous research there, otherwise '''remove it'''.


=== Redirects ===
=== Redirects ===
Line 33: Line 33:


<!-- ADD INTERWIKIS BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ADD INTERWIKIS BELOW THIS LINE -->
[[ko:틀:고유연구?]]
[[pl:Szablon:Or]]
</includeonly>
</includeonly>

Latest revision as of 19:35, 31 May 2013

This template tag will categorise tagged articles into Category:Articles that may contain original research but not this template itself. This template is a self-reference and so is part of the LIMSwiki project rather than the wiki content.

The intention of this tag is to nudge fellow editors who may inadvertently (or otherwise) introduce text that appears based upon original research, into supporting such text through demonstrating its previously researched origins. This tag provides a good faith means for editors to allow given text of fellow editors to remain temporarily in a given article until such time as the text's previously researched origins are supported. In the event that researched origins for the text are not produced after a relatively small passage of time (ie: no more than a few days), the tagging editor would generally be right in assuming that it could be edited or otherwise removed from the article to comply with Wikipedia:No original research. When a given editor adds this template he or she must concurrently add corresponding text to the tagged article's talk page to explain their concerns relative to original research for the given tagged text unless talk already exists relative to such concerns. If a given article has been tagged and the tagging editor doesn't ensure that corresponding article talk relative to the tag isn't either already available or added within a short amount of time (ie: no more than 24 hours) then fellow editors are within their rights to remove the tag or alternatively, add talk in support of its use.

Usage

{{or |date=August 2022}}
This template's usage is simple, after a passage of text in a given article that appears to be original research one simply tacks on {{or}} to specify that particular passage as likely being of questionable origin. Do not forget to ensure that there is corresponding article talk to explain one's usage of this tag.
For example in the original article the following text may appear:
  • Based upon the theories of some ancient religious scholars the world is indeed flat.
To mark this particular passage merely edit in {{or}} at the end of "flat." so that it will appear in this way:
  • Based upon the theories of some ancient religious scholars the world is indeed flat.[original research?]

Do not use this tag to label text which appears false or doubtful, especially in the case of biographies of living people. In the case of text that appears false or doubtful and is not part of a biography of a living person then move such text to the discussion page and ask for citations of previous research there, otherwise remove it.

Redirects

See also