Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text)
 
(281 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig3 Husen DataSciJourn2017 16-1.png|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig2 Berezin PLoSCompBio23 19-12.png|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Recommended versus certified repositories: Mind the gap|Recommended versus certified repositories: Mind the gap]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information|Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information]]"'''


Researchers are increasingly required to make research data publicly available in data repositories. Although several organizations propose criteria to recommend and evaluate the quality of data repositories, there is no consensus of what constitutes a good data repository. In this paper, we investigate, first, which data repositories are recommended by various stakeholders (publishers, funders, and community organizations) and second, which repositories are certified by a number of organizations. We then compare these two lists of repositories, and the criteria for recommendation and certification. We find that criteria used by organizations recommending and certifying repositories are similar, although the certification criteria are generally more detailed. We distill the lists of criteria into seven main categories: “Mission,” “Community/Recognition,” “Legal and Contractual Compliance,” “Access/Accessibility,” “Technical Structure/Interface,” “Retrievability,” and “Preservation.” Although the criteria are similar, the lists of repositories that are recommended by the various agencies are very different. Out of all of the recommended repositories, less than six percent obtained certification. As certification is becoming more important, steps should be taken to decrease this gap between recommended and certified repositories, and ensure that certification standards become applicable, and applied, to the repositories which researchers are currently using. ('''[[Journal:Recommended versus certified repositories: Mind the gap|Full article...]]''')<br />
[[Information]] is the cornerstone of [[research]], from experimental data/[[metadata]] and computational processes to complex inventories of reagents and equipment. These 10 simple rules discuss best practices for leveraging [[laboratory information management system]]s (LIMS) to transform this large information load into useful scientific findings. The development of [[mathematical model]]s that can predict the properties of biological systems is the holy grail of [[computational biology]]. Such models can be used to test biological hypotheses, guide the development of biomanufactured products, engineer new systems meeting user-defined specifications, and much more ... ('''[[Journal:Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
 
''Recently featured'':  
''Recently featured'':
: ▪ [[Journal:Usability evaluation of laboratory information systems|Usability evaluation of laboratory information systems]]
{{flowlist |
: ▪ [[Journal:Data management: New tools, new organization, and new skills in a French research institute|Data management: New tools, new organization, and new skills in a French research institute]]
* [[Journal:Hierarchical AI enables global interpretation of culture plates in the era of digital microbiology|Hierarchical AI enables global interpretation of culture plates in the era of digital microbiology]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Comprehending the health informatics spectrum: Grappling with system entropy and advancing quality clinical research|Comprehending the health informatics spectrum: Grappling with system entropy and advancing quality clinical research]]
* [[Journal:Critical analysis of the impact of AI on the patient–physician relationship: A multi-stakeholder qualitative study|Critical analysis of the impact of AI on the patient–physician relationship: A multi-stakeholder qualitative study]]
* [[Journal:Judgements of research co-created by generative AI: Experimental evidence|Judgements of research co-created by generative AI: Experimental evidence]]
}}

Latest revision as of 18:03, 10 June 2024

Fig2 Berezin PLoSCompBio23 19-12.png

"Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information"

Information is the cornerstone of research, from experimental data/metadata and computational processes to complex inventories of reagents and equipment. These 10 simple rules discuss best practices for leveraging laboratory information management systems (LIMS) to transform this large information load into useful scientific findings. The development of mathematical models that can predict the properties of biological systems is the holy grail of computational biology. Such models can be used to test biological hypotheses, guide the development of biomanufactured products, engineer new systems meeting user-defined specifications, and much more ... (Full article...)

Recently featured:

Retrieved from "https://www.limswiki.org/index.php?title=Template:Article_of_the_week&oldid=64398"