Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"
Shawndouglas (talk | contribs) (Updated article of the week text.) |
Shawndouglas (talk | contribs) (Updated article of the week text.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''"[[Journal: | '''"[[Journal:Bioinformatics: Indispensable, yet hidden in plain sight|Bioinformatics: Indispensable, yet hidden in plain sight]]"''' | ||
This | [[Bioinformatics]] has multitudinous identities, organizational alignments and disciplinary links. This variety allows bioinformaticians and bioinformatic work to contribute to much (if not most) of life science research in profound ways. The multitude of bioinformatic work also translates into a multitude of credit-distribution arrangements, apparently dismissing that work. | ||
We report on the epistemic and social arrangements that characterize the relationship between bioinformatics and life science. We describe, in sociological terms, the character, power and future of bioinformatic work. The character of bioinformatic work is such that its cultural, institutional and technical structures allow for it to be black-boxed easily. The result is that bioinformatic expertise and contributions travel easily and quickly, yet remain largely uncredited. The power of bioinformatic work is shaped by its dependency on life science work, which combined with the black-boxed character of bioinformatic expertise further contributes to situating bioinformatics on the periphery of the life sciences. Finally, the imagined futures of bioinformatic work suggest that bioinformatics will become ever more indispensable without necessarily becoming more visible, forcing bioinformaticians into difficult professional and career choices. ('''[[Journal:Bioinformatics: Indispensable, yet hidden in plain sight|Full article...]]''')<br /> | |||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
''Recently featured'': | ''Recently featured'': | ||
: ▪ [[Journal:Global data quality assessment and the situated nature of “best” research practices in biology|Global data quality assessment and the situated nature of “best” research practices in biology]] | |||
: ▪ [[Journal:Neuroimaging, genetics, and clinical data sharing in Python using the CubicWeb framework|Neuroimaging, genetics, and clinical data sharing in Python using the CubicWeb framework]] | : ▪ [[Journal:Neuroimaging, genetics, and clinical data sharing in Python using the CubicWeb framework|Neuroimaging, genetics, and clinical data sharing in Python using the CubicWeb framework]] | ||
: ▪ [[Journal:Analyzing the field of bioinformatics with the multi-faceted topic modeling technique|Analyzing the field of bioinformatics with the multi-faceted topic modeling technique]] | : ▪ [[Journal:Analyzing the field of bioinformatics with the multi-faceted topic modeling technique|Analyzing the field of bioinformatics with the multi-faceted topic modeling technique]] | ||
Revision as of 15:53, 28 August 2017
"Bioinformatics: Indispensable, yet hidden in plain sight"
Bioinformatics has multitudinous identities, organizational alignments and disciplinary links. This variety allows bioinformaticians and bioinformatic work to contribute to much (if not most) of life science research in profound ways. The multitude of bioinformatic work also translates into a multitude of credit-distribution arrangements, apparently dismissing that work.
We report on the epistemic and social arrangements that characterize the relationship between bioinformatics and life science. We describe, in sociological terms, the character, power and future of bioinformatic work. The character of bioinformatic work is such that its cultural, institutional and technical structures allow for it to be black-boxed easily. The result is that bioinformatic expertise and contributions travel easily and quickly, yet remain largely uncredited. The power of bioinformatic work is shaped by its dependency on life science work, which combined with the black-boxed character of bioinformatic expertise further contributes to situating bioinformatics on the periphery of the life sciences. Finally, the imagined futures of bioinformatic work suggest that bioinformatics will become ever more indispensable without necessarily becoming more visible, forcing bioinformaticians into difficult professional and career choices. (Full article...)
Recently featured: