Difference between revisions of "User:Shawndouglas/sandbox/sublevel5"
Shawndouglas (talk | contribs) Tag: Reverted |
Shawndouglas (talk | contribs) Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Sandbox begins below== | ==Sandbox begins below== | ||
[[File: | [[File:|right|350px]] | ||
'''Title''': ''What are the organizational justifications for a laboratory information management system (LIMS)?'' | '''Title''': ''What are the organizational justifications for a laboratory information management system (LIMS)?'' | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
As a lab manager or stakeholder in your organization, you've concluded that a [[laboratory information management system]] (LIMS) makes the most sense for better managing [[workflow]]s and data management practices. However, you may not be the primary decision maker for LIMS acquisition and deployment within your organization, which means you may have to present your case (i.e., provide justification) for the LIMS to those primary decision makers. This justification should first be based on factors that are closest to the lab's essential laboratory functions, and then on more traditional economic and practical considerations, justifications, and benefits to the lab, as well as the overall organization. | |||
This brief topical article will examine organizational, economic, and practical justifications for LIMS acquisition, allowing you to better build a stronger case for LIMS acquisition. | |||
== == | == == | ||
Revision as of 17:36, 16 December 2023
 |
This is sublevel5 of my sandbox, where I play with features and test MediaWiki code. If you wish to leave a comment for me, please see my discussion page instead. |
Sandbox begins below
[[File:|right|350px]] Title: What are the organizational justifications for a laboratory information management system (LIMS)?
Author for citation: Shawn E. Douglas
License for content: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Publication date: December 2023
Introduction
As a lab manager or stakeholder in your organization, you've concluded that a laboratory information management system (LIMS) makes the most sense for better managing workflows and data management practices. However, you may not be the primary decision maker for LIMS acquisition and deployment within your organization, which means you may have to present your case (i.e., provide justification) for the LIMS to those primary decision makers. This justification should first be based on factors that are closest to the lab's essential laboratory functions, and then on more traditional economic and practical considerations, justifications, and benefits to the lab, as well as the overall organization.
This brief topical article will examine organizational, economic, and practical justifications for LIMS acquisition, allowing you to better build a stronger case for LIMS acquisition.
