File:Fig3 Fraggetta Diagnostics21 11-10.png

Figure 3. Comparison of some of the principal checkpoints before and after the implementation of digital pathology tools. On the left, during the grossing phase the case identification number was handwritten on every cassette before the introduction of case-specific 2D-barcodes directly generated by the LIS and laser-printed on the cassettes. Similarly, hand-labeled glass slides were randomly returned to the technicians and manually archived (right). The introduction of WSI and a scanner next to the staining instrument allowed the direct archiving of physical glass slides using the 2D barcodes.

Fraggetta, F.; Caputo, A.; Guglielmino, R.; Pellegrino, M.G.; Runza, G.; L'Imperio, V. (2021). "A survival guide for the rapid transition to a fully digital workflow: The Caltagirone example". Diagnostics 11 (10): 1916. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11101916. 

2021

Fraggetta, F.; Caputo, A.; Guglielmino, R.; Pellegrino, M.G.; Runza, G.; L'Imperio, V.

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International