File:Fig6 Beaulieu-JonesJMIRMedInfo2018 6-1.png

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Original file(2,500 × 1,458 pixels, file size: 674 KB, MIME type: image/png)

Summary

Description

Figure 6. Assessment of multiple imputation for each method. Using simulation 4, missing values were imputed multiple times with each method. The x-axes show the root mean square error (RMSE) between the imputed data and the observed values. The y-axes show the RMSE between multiple imputations of the same data. The axis scales vary between panels to better show the range of variation. The laboratory tests are indicated by the color of the points. The black diagonal line represents unity (y=x). Panels are ordered by each method’s mean deviation (MD) from unity, indicated in the top left corner of each panel. In the last 7 panels, the unity line is not visible because the variation between multiple imputations was close to zero. FI: fancyimpute; KNN: k-nearest neighbors; MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations; pmm: predictive mean matching; RF: random forest; SVD: singular value decomposition.

Source

Beaulieu-Jones, B.K.; Lavage, D.R.; Snyder, J.W.; Moore, J.H.; Pendergrass, S.A.; Bauer, C.R. (2018). "Characterizing and managing missing structured data in electronic health records: Data analysis". JMIR Medical Informatics 6 (1): e11. doi:10.2196/medinform.8960. 

Date

2018

Author

Beaulieu-Jones, B.K.; Lavage, D.R.; Snyder, J.W.; Moore, J.H.; Pendergrass, S.A.; Bauer, C.R.

Permission
(Reusing this file)

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Other versions


Licensing

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current20:47, 6 March 2018Thumbnail for version as of 20:47, 6 March 20182,500 × 1,458 (674 KB)Shawndouglas (talk | contribs)

Metadata