Operating system

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

An operating system (OS) is system software that manages computer hardware and software resources, and provides common services for computer programs.

Time-sharing operating systems schedule tasks for efficient use of the system and may also include accounting software for cost allocation of processor time, mass storage, peripherals, and other resources.

For hardware functions such as input and output and memory allocation, the operating system acts as an intermediary between programs and the computer hardware,[1][2] although the application code is usually executed directly by the hardware and frequently makes system calls to an OS function or is interrupted by it. Operating systems are found on many devices that contain a computer – from cellular phones and video game consoles to web servers and supercomputers.

In the personal computer market, as of September 2023, Microsoft Windows holds a dominant market share of around 68%. macOS by Apple Inc. is in second place (20%), and the varieties of Linux, including ChromeOS, are collectively in third place (7%).[3] In the mobile sector (including smartphones and tablets), as of September 2023, Android's share is 68.92%, followed by Apple's iOS and iPadOS with 30.42%, and other operating systems with .66%.[4] Linux distributions are dominant in the server and supercomputing sectors. Other specialized classes of operating systems (special-purpose operating systems),[5][6] such as embedded and real-time systems, exist for many applications. Security-focused operating systems also exist. Some operating systems have low system requirements (e.g. light-weight Linux distribution). Others may have higher system requirements.

Some operating systems require installation or may come pre-installed with purchased computers (OEM-installation), whereas others may run directly from media (i.e. live CD) or flash memory (i.e. USB stick).

Definition and purpose

An operating system is difficult to define,[7] but has been called "the layer of software that manages a computer's resources for its users and their applications".[8] Operating systems include the software that is always running, called a kernel—but can include other software as well.[7][9] The two other types of programs that can run on a computer are system programs—which are associated with the operating system, but may not be part of the kernel—and applications—all other software.[9]

There are three main purposes that an operating system fulfills:[10]

  • Operating systems allocate resources between different applications, deciding when they will receive central processing unit (CPU) time or space in memory.[10] On modern personal computers, users often want to run several applications at once. In order to ensure that one program cannot monopolize the computer's limited hardware resources, the operating system gives each application a share of the resource, either in time (CPU) or space (memory).[11][12] The operating system also must isolate applications from each other to protect them from errors and security vulnerability is another application's code, but enable communications between different applications.[13]
  • Operating systems provide an interface that abstracts the details of accessing hardware details (such as physical memory) to make things easier for programmers.[10][14] Virtualization also enables the operating system to mask limited hardware resources; for example, virtual memory can provide a program with the illusion of nearly unlimited memory that exceeds the computer's actual memory.[15]
  • Operating systems provide common services, such as an interface for accessing network and disk devices. This enables an application to be run on different hardware without needing to be rewritten.[16] Which services to include in an operating system varies greatly, and this functionality makes up the great majority of code for most operating systems.[17]

Types of operating systems

Multicomputer operating systems

With multiprocessors multiple CPUs share memory. A multicomputer or cluster computer has multiple CPUs, each of which has its own memory. Multicomputers were developed because large multiprocessors are difficult to engineer and prohibitively expensive;[18] they are universal in cloud computing because of the size of the machine needed.[19] The different CPUs often need to send and receive messages to each other;[20] to ensure good performance, the operating systems for these machines need to minimize this copying of packets.[21] Newer systems are often multiqueue—separating groups of users into separate queues—to reduce the need for packet copying and support more concurrent users.[22] Another technique is remote direct memory access, which enables each CPU to access memory belonging to other CPUs.[20] Multicomputer operating systems often support remote procedure calls where a CPU can call a procedure on another CPU,[23] or distributed shared memory, in which the operating system uses virtualization to generate shared memory that does not actually exist.[24]

Distributed systems

A distributed system is a group of distinct, networked computers—each of which might have their own operating system and file system. Unlike multicomputers, they may be dispersed anywhere in the world.[25] Middleware, an additional software layer between the operating system and applications, is often used to improve consistency. Although it functions similarly to an operating system, it is not a true operating system.[26]

Embedded

Embedded operating systems are designed to be used in embedded computer systems, whether they are internet of things objects or not connected to a network. Embedded systems include many household appliances. The distinguishing factor is that they do not load user-installed software. Consequently, they do not need protection between different applications, enabling simpler designs. Very small operating systems might run in less than 10 kilobytes,[27] and the smallest are for smart cards.[28] Examples include Embedded Linux, QNX, VxWorks, and the extra-small systems RIOT and TinyOS.[29]

Real-time

A real-time operating system is an operating system that guarantees to process events or data by or at a specific moment in time. Hard real-time systems require exact timing and are common in manufacturing, avionics, military, and other similar uses.[29] With soft real-time systems, the occasional missed event is acceptable; this category often includes audio or multimedia systems, as well as smartphones.[29] In order for hard real-time systems be sufficiently exact in their timing, often they are just a library with no protection between applications, such as eCos.[29]

Virtual machine

A virtual machine is an operating system that runs as an application on top of another operating system.[15] The virtual machine is unaware that it is an application and operates as if it had its own hardware.[15][30] Virtual machines can be paused, saved, and resumed, making them useful for operating systems research, development,[31] and debugging.[32] They also enhance portability by enabling applications to be run on a computer even if they are not compatible with the base operating system.[15]

History

Early computers were built to perform a series of single tasks, like a calculator. Basic operating system features were developed in the 1950s, such as resident monitor functions that could automatically run different programs in succession to speed up processing. Operating systems did not exist in their modern and more complex forms until the early 1960s.[33] Hardware features were added, that enabled use of runtime libraries, interrupts, and parallel processing. When personal computers became popular in the 1980s, operating systems were made for them similar in concept to those used on larger computers.

In the 1940s, the earliest electronic digital systems had no operating systems. Electronic systems of this time were programmed on rows of mechanical switches or by jumper wires on plugboards. These were special-purpose systems that, for example, generated ballistics tables for the military or controlled the printing of payroll checks from data on punched paper cards. After programmable general-purpose computers were invented, machine languages(consisting of strings of the binary digits 0 and 1 on punched paper tape) were introduced that sped up the programming process (Stern, 1981).[full citation needed]

An IBM System 360/65 Operator's Panel. OS/360 was used on most IBM mainframe computers beginning in 1966, including computers used by the Apollo program.

In the early 1950s, a computer could execute only one program at a time. Each user had sole use of the computer for a limited period and would arrive at a scheduled time with their program and data on punched paper cards or punched tape. The program would be loaded into the machine, and the machine would be set to work until the program completed or crashed. Programs could generally be debugged via a front panel using toggle switches and panel lights. It is said that Alan Turing was a master of this on the early Manchester Mark 1 machine, and he was already deriving the primitive conception of an operating system from the principles of the universal Turing machine.[33]

Later machines came with libraries of programs, which would be linked to a user's program to assist in operations such as input and output and compiling (generating machine code from human-readable symbolic code). This was the genesis of the modern-day operating system. However, machines still ran a single job at a time. At Cambridge University in England, the job queue was at one time a washing line (clothesline) from which tapes were hung with different colored clothes-pegs to indicate job priority.[citation needed]

By the late 1950s, programs that one would recognize as an operating system were beginning to appear. Often pointed to as the earliest recognizable example is GM-NAA I/O, released in 1956 on the IBM 704. The first known example that actually referred to itself was the SHARE Operating System, a development of GM-NAA I/O, released in 1959. In a May 1960 paper describing the system, George Ryckman noted:

The development of computer operating systems have materially aided the problem of getting a program or series of programs on and off the computer efficiently.[34]

One of the more famous examples that is often found in discussions of early systems is the Atlas Supervisor, running on the Atlas in 1962.[35] It was referred to as such in a December 1961 article describing the system, but the context of "the Operating System" is more along the lines of "the system operates in the fashion". The Atlas team itself used the term "supervisor",[36] which was widely used along with "monitor". Brinch Hansen described it as "the most significant breakthrough in the history of operating systems."[37]

Mainframes

Through the 1950s, many major features were pioneered in the field of operating systems on mainframe computers, including batch processing, input/output interrupting, buffering, multitasking, spooling, runtime libraries, link-loading, and programs for sorting records in files. These features were included or not included in application software at the option of application programmers, rather than in a separate operating system used by all applications. In 1959, the SHARE Operating System was released as an integrated utility for the IBM 704, and later in the 709 and 7090 mainframes, although it was quickly supplanted by IBSYS/IBJOB on the 709, 7090 and 7094, which in turn influenced the later 7040-PR-150 (7040/7044) and 1410-PR-155 (1410/7010) operating systems.

During the 1960s, IBM's OS/360 introduced the concept of a single OS spanning an entire product line, which was crucial for the success of the System/360 machines. IBM's current mainframe operating systems are distant descendants of this original system and modern machines are backward compatible with applications written for OS/360.[citation needed]

OS/360 also pioneered the concept that the operating system keeps track of all of the system resources that are used, including program and data space allocation in main memory and file space in secondary storage, and file locking during updates. When a process is terminated for any reason, all of these resources are re-claimed by the operating system.

The alternative CP-67 system for the S/360-67 started a whole line of IBM operating systems focused on the concept of virtual machines. Other operating systems used on IBM S/360 series mainframes included systems developed by IBM: DOS/360[a] (Disk Operating System), TSS/360 (Time Sharing System), TOS/360 (Tape Operating System), BOS/360 (Basic Operating System), and ACP (Airline Control Program), as well as a few non-IBM systems: MTS (Michigan Terminal System), MUSIC (Multi-User System for Interactive Computing), and ORVYL (Stanford Timesharing System).

Control Data Corporation developed the SCOPE operating system in the 1960s, for batch processing. In cooperation with the University of Minnesota, the Kronos and later the NOS operating systems were developed during the 1970s, which supported simultaneous batch and timesharing use. Like many commercial timesharing systems, its interface was an extension of the Dartmouth BASIC operating systems, one of the pioneering efforts in timesharing and programming languages. In the late 1970s, Control Data and the University of Illinois developed the PLATO operating system, which used plasma panel displays and long-distance time sharing networks. Plato was remarkably innovative for its time, featuring real-time chat, and multi-user graphical games.

In 1961, Burroughs Corporation introduced the B5000 with the MCP (Master Control Program) operating system. The B5000 was a stack machine designed to exclusively support high-level languages with no assembler;[b] indeed, the MCP was the first OS to be written exclusively in a high-level language (ESPOL, a dialect of ALGOL). MCP also introduced many other ground-breaking innovations, such as being the first commercial implementation of virtual memory. MCP is still in use today in the Unisys company's MCP/ClearPath line of computers.

UNIVAC, the first commercial computer manufacturer, produced a series of EXEC operating systems.[38][39][40] Like all early main-frame systems, this batch-oriented system managed magnetic drums, disks, card readers and line printers. In the 1970s, UNIVAC produced the Real-Time Basic (RTB) system to support large-scale time sharing, also patterned after the Dartmouth BC system.

General Electric developed General Electric Comprehensive Operating Supervisor (GECOS), which primarily supported batch processing. After its acquisition by Honeywell, it was renamed General Comprehensive Operating System (GCOS).

Bell Labs,[c] General Electric and MIT developed Multiplexed Information and Computing Service (Multics), which introduced the concept of ringed security privilege levels.

Digital Equipment Corporation developed many operating systems for its various computer lines, including TOPS-10 and TOPS-20 time-sharing systems for the 36-bit PDP-10 class systems. Before the widespread use of UNIX, TOPS-10 was a particularly popular system in universities, and in the early ARPANET community. RT-11 was a single-user real-time OS for the PDP-11 class minicomputer, and RSX-11 was the corresponding multi-user OS.

From the late 1960s through the late 1970s, several hardware capabilities evolved that allowed similar or ported software to run on more than one system. Early systems had utilized microprogramming to implement features on their systems in order to permit different underlying computer architectures to appear to be the same as others in a series. In fact, most 360s after the 360/40 (except the 360/44, 360/75, 360/91, 360/95 and 360/195) were microprogrammed implementations.

The enormous investment in software for these systems made since the 1960s caused most of the original computer manufacturers to continue to develop compatible operating systems along with the hardware. Notable supported mainframe operating systems include:

Microcomputers

PC DOS (1981), IBM's rebranding of MS-DOS, uses a command-line interface.

The earliest microcomputers lacked the capacity or requirement for the complex operating systems used in mainframes and minicomputers. Instead, they used minimalistic operating systems, often loaded from ROM and referred to as monitors. A significant early disk operating system was CP/M, widely supported across many early microcomputers. Microsoft closely imitated CP/M with its MS-DOS, which gained widespread popularity as the operating system for the IBM PC (IBM's version was known as IBM DOS or PC DOS).

In the 1984, Apple Computer introduced the Macintosh alongside its popular Apple II microcomputers. The Mac had a graphical user interface controlled via mouse. It ran an operating system later known as the (classic) Mac OS.

The introduction of the Intel 80286 CPU chip in February 1982, with 16-bit architecture and segmentation, and the Intel 80386 CPU chip in October 1985,[41] with 32-bit architecture and paging capabilities, provided personal computers with the ability to run multitasking operating systems like those of earlier superminicomputers and mainframes. Microsoft responded to this progress by hiring Dave Cutler, who had developed the VMS operating system for Digital Equipment Corporation. He would lead the development of the Windows NT operating system, which continues to serve as the basis for Microsoft's operating systems line. Steve Jobs, a co-founder of Apple Inc., started NeXT Computer Inc., which developed the NeXTSTEP operating system. NeXTSTEP would later be acquired by Apple Inc. and used, along with code from FreeBSD as the core of Mac OS X (macOS after latest name change).

The GNU Project was started by activist and programmer Richard Stallman with the goal of creating a complete free software replacement to the proprietary UNIX operating system. While the project was highly successful in duplicating the functionality of various parts of UNIX, development of the GNU Hurd kernel proved to be unproductive. In 1991, Finnish computer science student Linus Torvalds, with cooperation from volunteers collaborating over the Internet, released the first version of the Linux kernel. It was soon merged with the GNU user space components and system software to form a complete operating system commonly referred to as Linux.

The Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) is the UNIX derivative distributed by the University of California, Berkeley, starting in the 1970s. Freely distributed and ported to many minicomputers, it eventually also gained a following for use on PCs, mainly as FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD.

Examples

Unix and Unix-like operating systems

Evolution of Unix systems

Unix was originally written in assembly language.[42] Ken Thompson wrote B, mainly based on BCPL, based on his experience in the MULTICS project. B was replaced by C, and Unix, rewritten in C, developed into a large, complex family of inter-related operating systems which have been influential in every modern operating system (see History).

The Unix-like family is a diverse group of operating systems, with several major sub-categories including System V, BSD, and Linux. The name "UNIX" is a trademark of The Open Group which licenses it for use with any operating system that has been shown to conform to their definitions. "UNIX-like" is commonly used to refer to the large set of operating systems which resemble the original UNIX.

Unix-like systems run on a wide variety of computer architectures. They are used heavily for servers in business, as well as workstations in academic and engineering environments. Free UNIX variants, such as Linux and BSD, are popular in these areas.

Five operating systems are certified by The Open Group (holder of the Unix trademark) as Unix. HP's HP-UX and IBM's AIX are both descendants of the original System V Unix and are designed to run only on their respective vendor's hardware. In contrast, Sun Microsystems's Solaris can run on multiple types of hardware, including x86 and SPARC servers, and PCs. Apple's macOS, a replacement for Apple's earlier (non-Unix) classic Mac OS, is a hybrid kernel-based BSD variant derived from NeXTSTEP, Mach, and FreeBSD. IBM's z/OS UNIX System Services includes a shell and utilities based on Mortice Kerns' InterOpen products.

Unix interoperability was sought by establishing the POSIX standard. The POSIX standard can be applied to any operating system, although it was originally created for various Unix variants.

BSD and its descendants

The first server for the World Wide Web ran on NeXTSTEP, based on BSD.

A subgroup of the Unix family is the Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) family, which includes FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD. These operating systems are most commonly found on webservers, although they can also function as a personal computer OS. The Internet owes much of its existence to BSD, as many of the protocols now commonly used by computers to connect, send and receive data over a network were widely implemented and refined in BSD. The World Wide Web was also first demonstrated on a number of computers running an OS based on BSD called NeXTSTEP.

In 1974, University of California, Berkeley installed its first Unix system. Over time, students and staff in the computer science department there began adding new programs to make things easier, such as text editors. When Berkeley received new VAX computers in 1978 with Unix installed, the school's undergraduates modified Unix even more in order to take advantage of the computer's hardware possibilities. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency of the US Department of Defense took interest, and decided to fund the project. Many schools, corporations, and government organizations took notice and started to use Berkeley's version of Unix instead of the official one distributed by AT&T.

Steve Jobs, upon leaving Apple Inc. in 1985, formed NeXT Inc., a company that manufactured high-end computers running on a variation of BSD called NeXTSTEP. One of these computers was used by Tim Berners-Lee as the first webserver to create the World Wide Web.

Developers like Keith Bostic encouraged the project to replace any non-free code that originated with Bell Labs. Once this was done, however, AT&T sued. After two years of legal disputes, the BSD project spawned a number of free derivatives, such as NetBSD and FreeBSD (both in 1993), and OpenBSD (from NetBSD in 1995).

macOS

macOS (formerly "Mac OS X" and later "OS X") is a line of open core graphical operating systems developed, marketed, and sold by Apple Inc., the latest of which is pre-loaded on all currently shipping Macintosh computers. macOS is the successor to the original classic Mac OS, which had been Apple's primary operating system since 1984. Unlike its predecessor, macOS is a UNIX operating system built on technology that had been developed at NeXT through the second half of the 1980s and up until Apple purchased the company in early 1997. The operating system was first released in 1999 as Mac OS X Server 1.0, followed in March 2001 by a client version (Mac OS X v10.0 "Cheetah"). Since then, six more distinct "client" and "server" editions of macOS have been released, until the two were merged in OS X 10.7 "Lion".

Prior to its merging with macOS, the server edition – macOS Server – was architecturally identical to its desktop counterpart and usually ran on Apple's line of Macintosh server hardware. macOS Server included work group management and administration software tools that provide simplified access to key network services, including a mail transfer agent, a Samba server, an LDAP server, a domain name server, and others. With Mac OS X v10.7 Lion, all server aspects of Mac OS X Server have been integrated into the client version and the product re-branded as "OS X" (dropping "Mac" from the name). The server tools are now offered as an application.[43]

z/OS UNIX System Services

First introduced as the OpenEdition upgrade to MVS/ESA System Product Version 4 Release 3, announced[44] February 1993 with support for POSIX and other standards.[45][46][47] z/OS UNIX System Services is built on top of MVS services and cannot run independently. While IBM initially introduced OpenEdition to satisfy FIPS requirements, several z/OS component now require UNIX services, e.g., TCP/IP.

Linux

Ubuntu, desktop Linux distribution
A picture of Tux the penguin, the mascot of Linux. Linux is a Unix-like operating system that was first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds.[48][49][50][51]

The Linux kernel originated in 1991, as a project of Linus Torvalds, while a university student in Finland. He posted information about his project on a newsgroup for computer students and programmers, and received support and assistance from volunteers who succeeded in creating a complete and functional kernel.

Linux is Unix-like, but was developed without any Unix code, unlike BSD and its variants. Because of its open license model, the Linux kernel code is available for study and modification, which resulted in its use on a wide range of computing machinery from supercomputers to smartwatches. Although estimates suggest that Linux is used on only 2.81% of all "desktop" (or laptop) PCs,[3] it has been widely adopted for use in servers[52] and embedded systems[53] such as cell phones.

Linux has superseded Unix on many platforms and is used on most supercomputers, including all 500 most powerful supercomputers on the TOP500 list — having displaced all competitors by 2017.[54] Linux is also commonly used on other small energy-efficient computers, such as smartphones and smartwatches. The Linux kernel is used in some popular distributions, such as Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu, Linux Mint and Google's Android, ChromeOS, and ChromiumOS.

Microsoft Windows

Microsoft Windows is a family of proprietary operating systems designed by Microsoft Corporation and primarily targeted to x86 architecture based computers. As of 2022, its worldwide market share on all platforms was approximately 30%,[55] and on the desktop/laptop platforms, its market share was approximately 75%.[56] The latest version is Windows 11.

Microsoft Windows was first released in 1985, as an operating environment running on top of MS-DOS, which was the standard operating system shipped on most Intel architecture personal computers at the time. In 1995, Windows 95 was released which only used MS-DOS as a bootstrap. For backwards compatibility, Win9x could run real-mode MS-DOS[57][58] and 16-bit Windows 3.x[59] drivers. Windows ME, released in 2000, was the last version in the Win9x family. Later versions have all been based on the Windows NT kernel. Current client versions of Windows run on IA-32, x86-64 and Arm microprocessors.[60] In the past, Windows NT supported additional architectures.

Server editions of Windows are widely used, however, Windows' usage on servers is not as widespread as on personal computers as Windows competes against Linux and BSD for server market share.[61][62]

ReactOS is a Windows-alternative operating system, which is being developed on the principles of Windows – without using any of Microsoft's code.

Other

There have been many operating systems that were significant in their day but are no longer so, such as AmigaOS; OS/2 from IBM and Microsoft; classic Mac OS, the non-Unix precursor to Apple's macOS; BeOS; XTS-300; RISC OS; MorphOS; Haiku; BareMetal and FreeMint. Some are still used in niche markets and continue to be developed as minority platforms for enthusiast communities and specialist applications.

The z/OS operating system for IBM z/Architecture mainframe computers is still being used and developed, and

OpenVMS, formerly from DEC, is still under active development by VMS Software Inc. The IBM i operating system for IBM AS/400 and IBM Power Systems midrange computers is also still being used and developed.

Yet other operating systems are used almost exclusively in academia, for operating systems education or to do research on operating system concepts. A typical example of a system that fulfills both roles is MINIX, while for example Singularity is used purely for research. Another example is the Oberon System designed at ETH Zürich by Niklaus Wirth, Jürg Gutknecht and a group of students at the former Computer Systems Institute in the 1980s. It was used mainly for research, teaching, and daily work in Wirth's group.

Other operating systems have failed to win significant market share, but have introduced innovations that have influenced mainstream operating systems, not least Bell Labs' Plan 9.

Components

The components of an operating system are designed to ensure that various parts of a computer function cohesively. All user software must interact with the operating system to access hardware.

Kernel

A kernel connects the application software to the hardware of a computer.

With the aid of firmware and device drivers, the kernel provides the most basic level of control over all of the computer's hardware devices. It manages memory access for programs in the RAM, it determines which programs get access to which hardware resources, it sets up or resets the CPU's operating states for optimal operation at all times, and it organizes the data for long-term non-volatile storage with file systems on such media as disks, tapes, flash memory, etc.

Program execution

The operating system provides an interface between an application program and the computer hardware, so that an application program can interact with the hardware only by obeying rules and procedures programmed into the operating system. The operating system is also a set of services which simplify development and execution of application programs. Executing an application program typically involves the creation of a process by the operating system kernel, which assigns memory space and other resources, establishes a priority for the process in multi-tasking systems, loads program binary code into memory, and initiates execution of the application program, which then interacts with the user and with hardware devices. However, in some systems an application can request that the operating system execute another application within the same process, either as a subroutine or in a separate thread, e.g., the LINK and ATTACH facilities of OS/360 and successors.

Interrupts

An interrupt (also known as an abort, exception, fault, signal,[63] or trap)[64] provides an efficient way for most operating systems to react to the environment. Interrupts cause the central processing unit (CPU) to have a control flow change away from the currently running program to an interrupt handler, also known as an interrupt service routine (ISR).[65][66] An interrupt service routine may cause the central processing unit (CPU) to have a context switch.[67][d] The details of how a computer processes an interrupt vary from architecture to architecture, and the details of how interrupt service routines behave vary from operating system to operating system.[68] However, several interrupt functions are common.[68] The architecture and operating system must:[68]

  1. transfer control to an interrupt service routine.
  2. save the state of the currently running process.
  3. restore the state after the interrupt is serviced.
Software interrupt

A software interrupt is a message to a process that an event has occurred.[63] This contrasts with a hardware interrupt — which is a message to the central processing unit (CPU) that an event has occurred.[69] Software interrupts are similar to hardware interrupts — there is a change away from the currently running process.[70] Similarly, both hardware and software interrupts execute an interrupt service routine.

Software interrupts may be normally occurring events. It is expected that a time slice will occur, so the kernel will have to perform a context switch.[71] A computer program may set a timer to go off after a few seconds in case too much data causes an algorithm to take too long.[72]

Software interrupts may be error conditions, such as a malformed machine instruction.[72] However, the most common error conditions are division by zero and accessing an invalid memory address.[72]

Users can send messages to the kernel to modify the behavior of a currently running process.[72] For example, in the command-line environment, pressing the interrupt character (usually Control-C) might terminate the currently running process.[72]

To generate software interrupts for x86 CPUs, the INT assembly language instruction is available.[73] The syntax is INT X, where X is the offset number (in hexadecimal format) to the interrupt vector table.

Signal

To generate software interrupts in Unix-like operating systems, the kill(pid,signum) system call will send a signal to another process.[74] pid is the process identifier of the receiving process. signum is the signal number (in mnemonic format)[e] to be sent. (The abrasive name of kill was chosen because early implementations only terminated the process.)[75]

In Unix-like operating systems, signals inform processes of the occurrence of asynchronous events.[74] To communicate asynchronously, interrupts are required.[76] One reason a process needs to asynchronously communicate to another process solves a variation of the classic reader/writer problem.[77] The writer receives a pipe from the shell for its output to be sent to the reader's input stream.[78] The command-line syntax is alpha | bravo. alpha will write to the pipe when its computation is ready and then sleep in the wait queue.[79] bravo will then be moved to the ready queue and soon will read from its input stream.[80] The kernel will generate software interrupts to coordinate the piping.[80]

Signals may be classified into 7 categories.[74] The categories are:

  1. when a process finishes normally.
  2. when a process has an error exception.
  3. when a process runs out of a system resource.
  4. when a process executes an illegal instruction.
  5. when a process sets an alarm event.
  6. when a process is aborted from the keyboard.
  7. when a process has a tracing alert for debugging.
Hardware interrupt

Input/output (I/O) devices are slower than the CPU. Therefore, it would slow down the computer if the CPU had to wait for each I/O to finish. Instead, a computer may implement interrupts for I/O completion, avoiding the need for polling or busy waiting.[81]

Some computers require an interrupt for each character or word, costing a significant amount of CPU time. Direct memory access (DMA) is an architecture feature to allow devices to bypass the CPU and access main memory directly.[82] (Separate from the architecture, a device may perform direct memory access[f] to and from main memory either directly or via a bus.)[83][g]

Input/output

Interrupt-driven I/O

When a computer user types a key on the keyboard, typically the character appears immediately on the screen. Likewise, when a user moves a mouse, the cursor immediately moves across the screen. Each keystroke and mouse movement generates an interrupt called Interrupt-driven I/O. An interrupt-driven I/O occurs when a process causes an interrupt for every character[83] or word[84] transmitted.

Direct memory access

Devices such as hard disk drives, solid-state drives, and magnetic tape drives can transfer data at a rate high enough that interrupting the CPU for every byte or word transferred, and having the CPU transfer the byte or word between the device and memory, would require too much CPU time. Data is, instead, transferred between the device and memory independently of the CPU by hardware such as a channel or a direct memory access controller; an interrupt is delivered only when all the data is transferred.[85]

If a computer program executes a system call to perform a block I/O write operation, then the system call might execute the following instructions:

While the writing takes place, the operating system will context switch to other processes as normal. When the device finishes writing, the device will interrupt the currently running process by asserting an interrupt request. The device will also place an integer onto the data bus.[89] Upon accepting the interrupt request, the operating system will:

  • Push the contents of the program counter (a register) followed by the status register onto the call stack.[68]
  • Push the contents of the other registers onto the call stack. (Alternatively, the contents of the registers may be placed in a system table.)[89]
  • Read the integer from the data bus. The integer is an offset to the interrupt vector table. The vector table's instructions will then:
  • Access the device-status table.
  • Extract the process control block.
  • Perform a context switch back to the writing process.

When the writing process has its time slice expired, the operating system will:[90]

  • Pop from the call stack the registers other than the status register and program counter.
  • Pop from the call stack the status register.
  • Pop from the call stack the address of the next instruction, and set it back into the program counter.

With the program counter now reset, the interrupted process will resume its time slice.[68]

Privilege modes

Privilege rings for the x86 microprocessor architecture available in protected mode. Operating systems determine which processes run in each mode.

Modern computers support multiple modes of operation. CPUs with this capability offer at least two modes: user mode and supervisor mode. In general terms, supervisor mode operation allows unrestricted access to all machine resources, including all MPU instructions. User mode operation sets limits on instruction use and typically disallows direct access to machine resources. CPUs might have other modes similar to user mode as well, such as the virtual modes in order to emulate older processor types, such as 16-bit processors on a 32-bit one, or 32-bit processors on a 64-bit one.

At power-on or reset, the system begins in supervisor mode. Once an operating system kernel has been loaded and started, the boundary between user mode and supervisor mode (also known as kernel mode) can be established.

Supervisor mode is used by the kernel for low level tasks that need unrestricted access to hardware, such as controlling how memory is accessed, and communicating with devices such as disk drives and video display devices. User mode, in contrast, is used for almost everything else. Application programs, such as word processors and database managers, operate within user mode, and can only access machine resources by turning control over to the kernel, a process which causes a switch to supervisor mode. Typically, the transfer of control to the kernel is achieved by executing a software interrupt instruction, such as the Motorola 68000 TRAP instruction. The software interrupt causes the processor to switch from user mode to supervisor mode and begin executing code that allows the kernel to take control.

In user mode, programs usually have access to a restricted set of processor instructions, and generally cannot execute any instructions that could potentially cause disruption to the system's operation. In supervisor mode, instruction execution restrictions are typically removed, allowing the kernel unrestricted access to all machine resources.

The term "user mode resource" generally refers to one or more CPU registers, which contain information that the running program is not allowed to alter. Attempts to alter these resources generally cause a switch to supervisor mode, where the operating system can deal with the illegal operation the program was attempting; for example, by forcibly terminating ("killing") the program.

Memory management

Among other things, a multiprogramming operating system kernel must be responsible for managing all system memory which is currently in use by the programs. This ensures that a program does not interfere with memory already in use by another program. Since programs time share, each program must have independent access to memory.

Cooperative memory management, used by many early operating systems, assumes that all programs make voluntary use of the kernel's memory manager, and do not exceed their allocated memory. This system of memory management is almost never seen any more, since programs often contain bugs which can cause them to exceed their allocated memory. If a program fails, it may cause memory used by one or more other programs to be affected or overwritten. Malicious programs or viruses may purposefully alter another program's memory, or may affect the operation of the operating system itself. With cooperative memory management, it takes only one misbehaved program to crash the system.

Memory protection enables the kernel to limit a process' access to the computer's memory. Various methods of memory protection exist, including memory segmentation and paging. All methods require some level of hardware support (such as the 80286 MMU), which does not exist in all computers.

In both segmentation and paging, certain protected mode registers specify to the CPU what memory address it should allow a running program to access. Attempts to access other addresses trigger an interrupt, which causes the CPU to re-enter supervisor mode, placing the kernel in charge. This is called a segmentation violation or Seg-V for short, and since it is both difficult to assign a meaningful result to such an operation, and because it is usually a sign of a misbehaving program, the kernel generally resorts to terminating the offending program, and reports the error.

Windows versions 3.1 through ME had some level of memory protection, but programs could easily circumvent the need to use it. A general protection fault would be produced, indicating a segmentation violation had occurred; however, the system would often crash anyway.

Virtual memory

Many operating systems can "trick" programs into using memory scattered around the hard disk and RAM as if it is one continuous chunk of memory, called virtual memory.

The use of virtual memory addressing (such as paging or segmentation) means that the kernel can choose what memory each program may use at any given time, allowing the operating system to use the same memory locations for multiple tasks.

If a program tries to access memory that is not accessible[h] memory, but nonetheless has been allocated to it, the kernel is interrupted (see § Memory management). This kind of interrupt is typically a page fault.

When the kernel detects a page fault it generally adjusts the virtual memory range of the program which triggered it, granting it access to the memory requested. This gives the kernel discretionary power over where a particular application's memory is stored, or even whether or not it has actually been allocated yet.

In modern operating systems, memory which is accessed less frequently can be temporarily stored on a disk or other media to make that space available for use by other programs. This is called swapping, as an area of memory can be used by multiple programs, and what that memory area contains can be swapped or exchanged on demand.

Virtual memory provides the programmer or the user with the perception that there is a much larger amount of RAM in the computer than is really there.[91]

Concurrency

Concurrency refers to the operating system's ability to carry out multiple tasks simultaneously.[92] Virtually all modern operating systems support concurrency.[93]

Threads enable splitting a process' work into multiple parts that can run simultaneously.[94] The number of threads is not limited by the number of processors available. If there are more threads than processors, the operating system kernel schedules, suspends, and resumes threads, controlling when each thread runs and how much CPU time it receives.[95] During a context switch a running thread is suspended, its state is saved into the thread control block and stack, and the state of the new thread is loaded in.[96] Historically, on many systems a thread could run until it relinquished control (cooperative multitasking). Because this model can allow a single thread to monopolize the processor, most operating systems now can interrupt a thread (preemptive multitasking).[97]

Threads have their own thread ID, program counter (PC), a register set, and a stack, but share code, heap data, and other resources with other threads of the same process.[98][99] Thus, there is less overhead to create a thread than a new process.[100] On single-CPU systems, concurrency is switching between processes. Many computers have multiple CPUs.[101] Parallelism with multiple threads running on different CPUs can speed up a program, depending on how much of it can be executed concurrently.[102]

File system

File systems allow users and programs to organize and sort files on a computer, often through the use of directories (or folders).

Permanent storage devices used in twenty-first century computers, unlike volatile dynamic random-access memory (DRAM), are still accessible after a crash or power failure. Permanent (non-volatile) storage is much cheaper per byte, but takes several orders of magnitude longer to access, read, and write.[103][104] The two main technologies are a hard drive consisting of magnetic disks, and flash memory (a solid-state drive that stores data in electrical circuits). The latter is more expensive but faster and more durable.[105][106]

File systems are an abstraction used by the operating system to simplify access to permanent storage. They provide human-readable filenames and other metadata, increase performance via amortization of accesses, prevent multiple threads from accessing the same section of memory, and include checksums to identify corruption.[107] File systems are composed of files (named collections of data, of an arbitrary size) and directories (also called folders) that list human-readable filenames and other directories.[108] An absolute file path begins at the root directory and lists subdirectories divided by punctuation, while a relative path defines the location of a file from a directory.[109][110]

System calls (which are sometimes wrapped by libraries) enable applications to create, delete, open, and close files, as well as link, read, and write to them. All these operations are carried out by the operating system on behalf of the application.[111] The operating system's efforts to reduce latency include storing recently requested blocks of memory in a cache and prefetching data that the application has not asked for, but might need next.[112] Device drivers are software specific to each input/output (I/O) device that enables the operating system to work without modification over different hardware.[113][114]

Another component of file systems is a dictionary that maps a file's name and metadata to the data block where its contents are stored.[115] Most file systems use directories to convert file names to file numbers. To find the block number, the operating system uses an index (often implemented as a tree).[116] Separately, there is a free space map to track free blocks, commonly implemented as a bitmap.[116] Although any free block can be used to store a new file, many operating systems try to group together files in the same directory to maximize performance, or periodically reorganize files to reduce fragmentation.[117]

Maintaining data reliability in the face of a computer crash or hardware failure is another concern.[118] File writing protocols are designed with atomic operations so as not to leave permanent storage in a partially written, inconsistent state in the event of a crash at any point during writing.[119] Data corruption is addressed by redundant storage (for example, RAID—redundant array of inexpensive disks)[120][121] and checksums to detect when data has been corrupted. With multiple layers of checksums and backups of a file, a system can recover from multiple hardware failures. Background processes are often used to detect and recover from data corruption.[121]

Security

Security means protecting users from other users of the same computer, as well as from those who seeking remote access to it over a network.[122] Operating systems security rests on achieving the CIA triad: confidentiality (unauthorized users cannot access data), integrity (unauthorized users cannot modify data), and availability (ensuring that the system remains available to authorized users, even in the event of a denial of service attack).[123] As with other computer systems, isolating security domains—in the case of operating systems, the kernel, processes, and virtual machines—is key to achieving security.[124] Other ways to increase security include simplicity to minimize the attack surface, locking access to resources by default, checking all requests for authorization, principle of least authority (granting the minimum privilege essential for performing a task), privilege separation, and reducing shared data.[125]

Some operating system designs are more secure than others. Those with no isolation between the kernel and applications are least secure, while those with a monolithic kernel like most general-purpose operating systems are still vulnerable if any part of the kernel is compromised. A more secure design features microkernels that separate the kernel's privileges into many separate security domains and reduce the consequences of a single kernel breach.[126] Unikernels are another approach that improves security by minimizing the kernel and separating out other operating systems functionality by application.[126]

Most operating systems are written in C or C++, which create potential vulnerabilities for exploitation. Despite attempts to protect against them, vulnerabilities are caused by buffer overflow attacks, which are enabled by the lack of bounds checking.[127] Hardware vulnerabilities, some of them caused by CPU optimizations, can also be used to compromise the operating system.[128] There are known instances of operating system programmers deliberately implanting vulnerabilities, such as back doors.[129]

Operating systems security is hampered by their increasing complexity and the resulting inevitability of bugs.[130] Because formal verification of operating systems may not be feasible, developers use operating system hardening to reduce vulnerabilities,[131] e.g. address space layout randomization, control-flow integrity,[132] access restrictions,[133] and other techniques.[134] There are no restrictions on who can contribute code to open source operating systems; such operating systems have transparent change histories and distributed governance structures.[135] Open source developers strive to work collaboratively to find and eliminate security vulnerabilities, using code review and type checking to expunge malicious code.[136][137] Andrew S. Tanenbaum advises releasing the source code of all operating systems, arguing that it prevents developers from placing trust in secrecy and thus relying on the unreliable practice of security by obscurity.[138]

User interface

A user interface (UI) is essential to support human interaction with a computer. The two most common user interface types for any computer are

For personal computers, including smartphones and tablet computers, and for workstations, user input is typically from a combination of keyboard, mouse, and trackpad or touchscreen, all of which are connected to the operating system with specialized software.[139] Personal computer users who are not software developers or coders often prefer GUIs for both input and output; GUIs are supported by most personal computers.[140] The software to support GUIs is more complex than a command line for input and plain text output. Plain text output is often preferred by programmers, and is easy to support.[141]

Operating system development as a hobby

A hobby operating system may be classified as one whose code has not been directly derived from an existing operating system, and has few users and active developers.[142]

In some cases, hobby development is in support of a "homebrew" computing device, for example, a simple single-board computer powered by a 6502 microprocessor. Or, development may be for an architecture already in widespread use. Operating system development may come from entirely new concepts, or may commence by modeling an existing operating system. In either case, the hobbyist is her/his own developer, or may interact with a small and sometimes unstructured group of individuals who have like interests.

Examples of hobby operating systems include Syllable and TempleOS.

Diversity of operating systems and portability

If an application is written for use on a specific operating system, and is ported to another OS, the functionality required by that application may be implemented differently by that OS (the names of functions, meaning of arguments, etc.) requiring the application to be adapted, changed, or otherwise maintained.

This cost in supporting operating systems diversity can be avoided by instead writing applications against software platforms such as Java or Qt. These abstractions have already borne the cost of adaptation to specific operating systems and their system libraries.

Another approach is for operating system vendors to adopt standards. For example, POSIX and OS abstraction layers provide commonalities that reduce porting costs.

Market share

See also

Notes

  1. ^ A combination of DOS/360 and emulation software was known as Compatibility Operating System (COS).
  2. ^ However, ESPOL did allow source programs to specify all of the operations of the instruction repertoire.
  3. ^ Bell Labs quickly dropped out, leaving GE and MIT.
  4. ^ Modern CPUs provide instructions (e.g. SYSENTER) to invoke selected kernel services without an interrupts. Visit https://wiki.osdev.org/SYSENTER for more information.
  5. ^ Examples include SIGINT, SIGSEGV, and SIGBUS.
  6. ^ often in the form of a DMA chip for smaller systems and I/O channels for larger systems
  7. ^ Modern motherboards have a DMA controller. Additionally, a device may also have one. Visit SCSI RDMA Protocol.
  8. ^ There are several reasons that the memory might be inaccessible
    • The address might be out of range
    • The address might refer to a page or segment that has been moved to a backing store
    • The address might refer to memory that has restricted access due to, e.g., key, ring.

References

  1. ^ Stallings (2005). Operating Systems, Internals and Design Principles. Pearson: Prentice Hall. p. 6.
  2. ^ Dhotre, I.A. (2009). Operating Systems. Technical Publications. p. 1.
  3. ^ a b "Desktop Operating System Market Share Worldwide". StatCounter Global Stats. Archived from the original on 2 October 2023. Retrieved 3 October 2023.
  4. ^ "Mobile & Tablet Operating System Market Share Worldwide". StatCounter Global Stats. Retrieved 2 October 2023.
  5. ^ "VII. Special-Purpose Systems - Operating System Concepts, Seventh Edition [Book]". www.oreilly.com. Archived from the original on 13 June 2021. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
  6. ^ "Special-Purpose Operating Systems - RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY Institute for Automation of Complex Power Systems - English". www.acs.eonerc.rwth-aachen.de. Archived from the original on 14 June 2021. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
  7. ^ a b Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 4.
  8. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 6.
  9. ^ a b Silberschatz et al. 2018, p. 6.
  10. ^ a b c Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 7.
  11. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, pp. 9–10.
  12. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, pp. 6–7.
  13. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 10.
  14. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 5.
  15. ^ a b c d Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 11.
  16. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, pp. 7, 9, 13.
  17. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, pp. 12–13.
  18. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 557.
  19. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 558.
  20. ^ a b Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 565.
  21. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 562.
  22. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 563.
  23. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 569.
  24. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 571.
  25. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 579.
  26. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 581.
  27. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, pp. 37–38.
  28. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 39.
  29. ^ a b c d Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 38.
  30. ^ Silberschatz et al. 2018, pp. 701.
  31. ^ Silberschatz et al. 2018, pp. 705.
  32. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 12.
  33. ^ a b Hansen, Per Brinch, ed. (2001). Classic Operating Systems. Springer. pp. 4–7. ISBN 0-387-95113-X. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 19 December 2020.
  34. ^ Ryckman, George (1960). "The computer operation language". IRE-AIEE-ACM '60 (Western): 341. doi:10.1145/1460361.1460406. S2CID 30745551.
  35. ^ Lavington, Simon (1998). A History of Manchester Computers (2nd ed.). Swindon: The British Computer Society. pp. 50–52. ISBN 978-1-902505-01-5.
  36. ^ Kilburn, T.; Payne, R. B.; Howarth, D. J. (December 1961). "The Atlas Supervisor". Institute of Electrical Engineers: 279–294. doi:10.1145/1460764.1460786. S2CID 16466990. Archived from the original on 9 June 2022. Retrieved 17 June 2022.
  37. ^ Brinch Hansen, Per (2000). Classic Operating Systems: From Batch Processing to Distributed Systems. Springer-Verlag.
  38. ^ EXEC I UNIVAC 1107 Executive System (PDF) (rev. 1 ed.). Sperry Rand. UP-2577. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 June 2022. Retrieved 15 May 2022.
  39. ^ UNIVAC Data Processing Division Multi-processor System EXEC II Programmers Reference Manual (PDF). Sperry Rand. 1966. UP-4058. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 June 2022. Retrieved 15 May 2022.
  40. ^ UNIVAC 1108 Multi-processor System Operating System EXEC 8 Programmers Reference (PDF) (rev. 1 ed.). Sperry Rand. 1968. UP-4144. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 May 2022. Retrieved 15 May 2022.
  41. ^ "Intel® Microprocessor Quick Reference Guide - Year". Intel. Archived from the original on 25 April 2016. Retrieved 24 April 2016.
  42. ^ Ritchie, Dennis. "Unix Manual, first edition". Lucent Technologies. Archived from the original on 18 May 2008. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
  43. ^ "OS X Mountain Lion – Move your Mac even further ahead". Apple. Archived from the original on 23 May 2011. Retrieved 7 August 2012.
  44. ^ "Openedition Services on MVS/ESA SP Version 4 Release 3 Announced and Availability of MVS/ESA SP Version 4 Release 3 With Additional Enhancements". Announcement Letters. IBM. 9 February 1993. 293-060. Retrieved 16 July 2023.
  45. ^ Introducing OpenEdition MVS. First Edition. IBM. December 1993. GC23-3010-00.
  46. ^ OpenEdition MVS POSIX.1 Conformance Document. First Edition. IBM. February 1993. GC23-3011-00.
  47. ^ OpenEdition MVS POSIX.2 Conformance Document. First Edition. IBM. December 1993. GC23-3012-00.
  48. ^ "Twenty Years of Linux according to Linus Torvalds". ZDNet. April 13, 2011. Archived from the original on September 19, 2016. Retrieved September 19, 2016.
  49. ^ Linus Benedict Torvalds (5 October 1991). "Free minix-like kernel sources for 386-AT". Newsgroupcomp.os.minix. Archived from the original on 2 March 2013. Retrieved 30 September 2011.
  50. ^ "What Is Linux: An Overview of the Linux Operating System". Medium. 11 April 2020. Retrieved 16 July 2023.
  51. ^ Linux Online (2008). "Linux Logos and Mascots". Archived from the original on 15 August 2010. Retrieved 11 August 2009.
  52. ^ "IDC report into Server market share". Idc.com. Archived from the original on 27 September 2012. Retrieved 7 August 2012.
  53. ^ LinuxDevices Staff (23 April 2008). "Linux still top embedded OS". LinuxGizmos.com. Archived from the original on 19 April 2016. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  54. ^ "Operating system Family / Linux | TOP500". www.top500.org. Retrieved 30 July 2023.
  55. ^ "Operating System Market Share Worldwide Jan–Dec 2022". 2022. Retrieved 4 November 2023.
  56. ^ "Desktop Operating System Market Share Worldwide Jan–Dec 2022". 2022. Retrieved 4 November 2023.
  57. ^ "Troubleshooting MS-DOS Compatibility Mode on Hard Disks". Microsoft Support. Archived from the original on 10 August 2012. Retrieved 7 August 2012.
  58. ^ "Using NDIS 2 PCMCIA Network Card Drivers in Windows 95". Microsoft Support. Archived from the original on 17 February 2013. Retrieved 7 August 2012.
  59. ^ "INFO: Windows 95 Multimedia Wave Device Drivers Must be 16 bit". Microsoft Support. Archived from the original on 17 February 2013. Retrieved 7 August 2012.
  60. ^ Arthur, Charles (5 January 2011). "'Windows 8' will run on ARM chips - but third-party apps will need rewrite". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 12 October 2016.
  61. ^ "Operating System Share by Groups for Sites in All Locations January 2009". Archived from the original on 6 July 2009. Retrieved 3 May 2010.
  62. ^ "Behind the IDC data: Windows still No. 1 in server operating systems". ZDNet. 26 February 2010. Archived from the original on 1 March 2010.
  63. ^ a b Kerrisk, Michael (2010). The Linux Programming Interface. No Starch Press. p. 388. ISBN 978-1-59327-220-3. A signal is a notification to a process that an event has occurred. Signals are sometimes described as software interrupts.
  64. ^ Hyde, Randall (1996). "Chapter Seventeen: Interrupts, Traps and Exceptions (Part 1)". The Art Of Assembly Language Programming. No Starch Press. Archived from the original on 22 December 2021. Retrieved 22 December 2021. The concept of an interrupt is something that has expanded in scope over the years. The 80x86 family has only added to the confusion surrounding interrupts by introducing the int (software interrupt) instruction. Indeed, different manufacturers have used terms like exceptions, faults, aborts, traps and interrupts to describe the phenomena this chapter discusses. Unfortunately there is no clear consensus as to the exact meaning of these terms. Different authors adopt different terms to their own use.
  65. ^ Tanenbaum, Andrew S. (1990). Structured Computer Organization, Third Edition. Prentice Hall. p. 308. ISBN 978-0-13-854662-5. Like the trap, the interrupt stops the running program and transfers control to an interrupt handler, which performs some appropriate action. When finished, the interrupt handler returns control to the interrupted program.
  66. ^ Silberschatz, Abraham (1994). Operating System Concepts, Fourth Edition. Addison-Wesley. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-201-50480-4. When an interrupt (or trap) occurs, the hardware transfers control to the operating system. First, the operating system preserves the state of the CPU by storing registers and the program counter. Then, it determines which type of interrupt has occurred. For each type of interrupt, separate segments of code in the operating system determine what action should be taken.
  67. ^ Silberschatz, Abraham (1994). Operating System Concepts, Fourth Edition. Addison-Wesley. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-201-50480-4. Switching the CPU to another process requires saving the state of the old process and loading the saved state for the new process. This task is known as a context switch.
  68. ^ a b c d e Silberschatz, Abraham (1994). Operating System Concepts, Fourth Edition. Addison-Wesley. p. 31. ISBN 978-0-201-50480-4.
  69. ^ Silberschatz, Abraham (1994). Operating System Concepts, Fourth Edition. Addison-Wesley. p. 30. ISBN 978-0-201-50480-4. Hardware may trigger an interrupt at any time by sending a signal to the CPU, usually by way of the system bus.
  70. ^ Kerrisk, Michael (2010). The Linux Programming Interface. No Starch Press. p. 388. ISBN 978-1-59327-220-3. Signals are analogous to hardware interrupts in that they interrupt the normal flow of execution of a program; in most cases, it is not possible to predict exactly when a signal will arrive.
  71. ^ Kerrisk, Michael (2010). The Linux Programming Interface. No Starch Press. p. 388. ISBN 978-1-59327-220-3. Among the types of events that cause the kernel to generate a signal for a process are the following: A software event occurred. For example, ... the process's CPU time limit was exceeded[.]
  72. ^ a b c d e Kerrisk, Michael (2010). The Linux Programming Interface. No Starch Press. p. 388. ISBN 978-1-59327-220-3.
  73. ^ "Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual" (PDF). Intel Corporation. September 2016. p. 610. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 March 2022. Retrieved 5 May 2022.
  74. ^ a b c Bach, Maurice J. (1986). The Design of the UNIX Operating System. Prentice-Hall. p. 200. ISBN 0-13-201799-7.
  75. ^ Kerrisk, Michael (2010). The Linux Programming Interface. No Starch Press. p. 400. ISBN 978-1-59327-220-3.
  76. ^ a b Tanenbaum, Andrew S. (1990). Structured Computer Organization, Third Edition. Prentice Hall. p. 308. ISBN 978-0-13-854662-5.
  77. ^ Silberschatz, Abraham (1994). Operating System Concepts, Fourth Edition. Addison-Wesley. p. 182. ISBN 978-0-201-50480-4.
  78. ^ Haviland, Keith; Salama, Ben (1987). UNIX System Programming. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. p. 153. ISBN 0-201-12919-1.
  79. ^ Haviland, Keith; Salama, Ben (1987). UNIX System Programming. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. p. 148. ISBN 0-201-12919-1.
  80. ^ a b Haviland, Keith; Salama, Ben (1987). UNIX System Programming. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. p. 149. ISBN 0-201-12919-1.
  81. ^ Tanenbaum, Andrew S. (1990). Structured Computer Organization, Third Edition. Prentice Hall. p. 292. ISBN 978-0-13-854662-5.
  82. ^ IBM (September 1968), "Main Storage" (PDF), IBM System/360 Principles of Operation (PDF), Eighth Edition, p. 7, archived (PDF) from the original on 19 March 2022, retrieved 13 April 2022
  83. ^ a b Tanenbaum, Andrew S. (1990). Structured Computer Organization, Third Edition. Prentice Hall. p. 294. ISBN 978-0-13-854662-5.
  84. ^ "Program Interrupt Controller (PIC)" (PDF). Users Handbook - PDP-7 (PDF). Digital Equipment Corporation. 1965. pp. 48. F-75. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 May 2022. Retrieved 20 April 2022.
  85. ^ PDP-1 Input-Output Systems Manual (PDF). Digital Equipment Corporation. pp. 19–20. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 January 2019. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
  86. ^ Silberschatz, Abraham (1994). Operating System Concepts, Fourth Edition. Addison-Wesley. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-201-50480-4.
  87. ^ Silberschatz, Abraham (1994). Operating System Concepts, Fourth Edition. Addison-Wesley. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-201-50480-4.
  88. ^ a b Tanenbaum, Andrew S. (1990). Structured Computer Organization, Third Edition. Prentice Hall. p. 295. ISBN 978-0-13-854662-5.
  89. ^ a b Tanenbaum, Andrew S. (1990). Structured Computer Organization, Third Edition. Prentice Hall. p. 309. ISBN 978-0-13-854662-5.
  90. ^ Tanenbaum, Andrew S. (1990). Structured Computer Organization, Third Edition. Prentice Hall. p. 310. ISBN 978-0-13-854662-5.
  91. ^ Stallings, William (2008). Computer Organization & Architecture. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited. p. 267. ISBN 978-81-203-2962-1.
  92. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 129.
  93. ^ Silberschatz et al. 2018, p. 159.
  94. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 130.
  95. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 131.
  96. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, pp. 157, 159.
  97. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 139.
  98. ^ Silberschatz et al. 2018, p. 160.
  99. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 183.
  100. ^ Silberschatz et al. 2018, p. 162.
  101. ^ Silberschatz et al. 2018, pp. 162–163.
  102. ^ Silberschatz et al. 2018, p. 164.
  103. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, pp. 492, 517.
  104. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, pp. 259–260.
  105. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, pp. 517, 530.
  106. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 260.
  107. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, pp. 492–493.
  108. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 496.
  109. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, pp. 496–497.
  110. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, pp. 274–275.
  111. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, pp. 502–504.
  112. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 507.
  113. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 508.
  114. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 359.
  115. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 545.
  116. ^ a b Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 546.
  117. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 547.
  118. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, pp. 589, 591.
  119. ^ Anderson & Dahlin 2014, pp. 591–592.
  120. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, pp. 385–386.
  121. ^ a b Anderson & Dahlin 2014, p. 592.
  122. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, pp. 605–606.
  123. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 608.
  124. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 609.
  125. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, pp. 609–610.
  126. ^ a b Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 612.
  127. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, pp. 648, 657.
  128. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, pp. 668–669, 674.
  129. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, pp. 679–680.
  130. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, pp. 605, 617–618.
  131. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, pp. 681–682.
  132. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 683.
  133. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 685.
  134. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 689.
  135. ^ Richet & Bouaynaya 2023, p. 92.
  136. ^ Richet & Bouaynaya 2023, pp. 92–93.
  137. ^ Berntsso, Strandén & Warg 2017, pp. 130–131.
  138. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 611.
  139. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, pp. 396, 402.
  140. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, pp. 395, 408.
  141. ^ Tanenbaum & Bos 2023, p. 402.
  142. ^ Holwerda, Thom (20 December 2009). "My OS Is Less Hobby than Yours". OS News. Retrieved 4 June 2024.

Further reading

External links

Notes

This article is a direct transclusion of the Wikipedia article and therefore may not meet the same editing standards as LIMSwiki.