Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text.)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''"[[Journal:Compliance culture or culture change? The role of funders in improving data management and sharing practice amongst researchers|Compliance culture or culture change? The role of funders in improving data management and sharing practice amongst researchers]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:ISO 15189 accreditation: Navigation between quality management and patient safety|ISO 15189 accreditation: Navigation between quality management and patient safety]]"'''
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig2 Neylon ResIdeasOut2017 3.jpg|240px]]</div>
There is a wide and growing interest in promoting research data management (RDM) and research data sharing (RDS) from many stakeholders in the research enterprise. Funders are under pressure from activists, from government, and from the wider public agenda towards greater transparency and access to encourage, require, and deliver improved data practices from the researchers they fund.


Funders are responding to this, and to their own interest in improved practice, by developing and implementing policies on RDM and RDS. In this review we examine the state of funder policies, the process of implementation and available guidance to identify the challenges and opportunities for funders in developing policy and delivering on the aspirations for improved community practice, greater transparency and engagement, and enhanced impact. ('''[[Journal:Compliance culture or culture change? The role of funders in improving data management and sharing practice amongst researchers|Full article...]]''')<br />
Accreditation is a valuable resource for [[Clinical laboratory|clinical laboratories]], and the development of an international standard for their accreditation represented a milestone on the path towards improved quality and safety in [[laboratory]] medicine. The recent revision of the international standard, [[ISO 15189]], has further strengthened its value not only for improving the [[Quality management system|quality system]] of a clinical laboratory but also for better answering the request for competence, focus on customers’ needs and ultimate value of laboratory services. Although in some countries more general standards such as [[ISO 9000|ISO 9001]] for quality systems or [[ISO 17025]] for testing laboratories are still used, there is increasing recognition of the value of ISO 15189 as the most appropriate and useful standard for the accreditation of medical laboratories. In fact, only this international standard recognizes the importance of all steps of the total testing process, namely extra-analytical phases, the need to focus on technical competence in addition to quality systems, and the focus on customers’ needs. ('''[[Journal:ISO 15189 accreditation: Navigation between quality management and patient safety|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':  
''Recently featured'':  
: ▪ [[Journal:Compliance culture or culture change? The role of funders in improving data management and sharing practice amongst researchers|Compliance culture or culture change? The role of funders in improving data management and sharing practice amongst researchers]]
: ▪ [[Journal:A review of the role of public health informatics in healthcare|A review of the role of public health informatics in healthcare]]
: ▪ [[Journal:A review of the role of public health informatics in healthcare|A review of the role of public health informatics in healthcare]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Preferred names, preferred pronouns, and gender identity in the electronic medical record and laboratory information system: Is pathology ready?|Preferred names, preferred pronouns, and gender identity in the electronic medical record and laboratory information system: Is pathology ready?]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Preferred names, preferred pronouns, and gender identity in the electronic medical record and laboratory information system: Is pathology ready?|Preferred names, preferred pronouns, and gender identity in the electronic medical record and laboratory information system: Is pathology ready?]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Experimental application of business process management technology to manage clinical pathways: A pediatric kidney transplantation follow-up case|Experimental application of business process management technology to manage clinical pathways: A pediatric kidney transplantation follow-up case]]

Revision as of 19:37, 5 February 2018

"ISO 15189 accreditation: Navigation between quality management and patient safety"

Accreditation is a valuable resource for clinical laboratories, and the development of an international standard for their accreditation represented a milestone on the path towards improved quality and safety in laboratory medicine. The recent revision of the international standard, ISO 15189, has further strengthened its value not only for improving the quality system of a clinical laboratory but also for better answering the request for competence, focus on customers’ needs and ultimate value of laboratory services. Although in some countries more general standards such as ISO 9001 for quality systems or ISO 17025 for testing laboratories are still used, there is increasing recognition of the value of ISO 15189 as the most appropriate and useful standard for the accreditation of medical laboratories. In fact, only this international standard recognizes the importance of all steps of the total testing process, namely extra-analytical phases, the need to focus on technical competence in addition to quality systems, and the focus on customers’ needs. (Full article...)

Recently featured:

Compliance culture or culture change? The role of funders in improving data management and sharing practice amongst researchers
A review of the role of public health informatics in healthcare
Preferred names, preferred pronouns, and gender identity in the electronic medical record and laboratory information system: Is pathology ready?