Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 White PractLabMed2021 26.jpg|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig4 Davies BMJHealthCareInfo2021 28-1.jpg|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Strategies for laboratory professionals to drive laboratory stewardship|Strategies for laboratory professionals to drive laboratory stewardship]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Development of a core competency framework for clinical informatics|Development of a core competency framework for clinical informatics]]"'''


Appropriate [[laboratory]] [[Medical test|testing]] is critical in today's healthcare environment that aims to improve patient care while reducing cost. In recent years, laboratory stewardship has emerged as a strategy for assuring [[Quality (business)|quality]] in laboratory medicine with the goal of providing the right test for the right patient at the right time. Implementing a laboratory stewardship program now presents a valuable opportunity for laboratory professionals to exercise leadership within health systems and to drive change toward realizing aims in healthcare. The proposed framework for program implementation includes five key elements: 1) a clear vision and organizational alignment; 2) appropriate skills for program execution and management; 3) resources to support the program; 4) incentives to motivate participation; and, 5) a plan of action that articulates program objectives and metrics. This framework builds upon principles of [[change management]], with emphasis on engagement with clinical and administrative stakeholders and the use of clinical data as the basis for change. These strategies enable laboratory professionals to cultivate organizational support for improving laboratory use and take a leading role in providing high-quality patient care. ('''[[Journal:Strategies for laboratory professionals to drive laboratory stewardship|Full article...]]''')<br />
Up to this point, there has not been a national core competency framework for [[clinical informatics]] in the U.K. Here we report on the final two iterations of work carried out towards the formation of a national core competency framework. This follows an initial systematic literature review of existing skills and competencies and a job listing analysis. An iterative approach was applied to framework development. Using a mixed-methods design, we carried out semi-structured interviews with participants involved in [[Informatics (academic field)|informatics]] (''n'' = 15). The framework was updated based on the interview findings and was subsequently distributed as part of a bespoke online digital survey for wider participation (''n'' = 87). The final version of the framework is based on the findings of the survey.('''[[Journal:Development of a core competency framework for clinical informatics|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':
{{flowlist |
{{flowlist |
* [[Journal:Strategies for laboratory professionals to drive laboratory stewardship|Strategies for laboratory professionals to drive laboratory stewardship]]
* [[Journal:Cybersecurity impacts for artificial intelligence use within Industry 4.0|Cybersecurity impacts for artificial intelligence use within Industry 4.0]]
* [[Journal:Cybersecurity impacts for artificial intelligence use within Industry 4.0|Cybersecurity impacts for artificial intelligence use within Industry 4.0]]
* [[Journal:Cross-border data transfer regulation in China|Cross-border data transfer regulation in China]]
* [[Journal:Cross-border data transfer regulation in China|Cross-border data transfer regulation in China]]
* [[Journal:Data and information systems management for urban water infrastructure condition assessment|Data and information systems management for urban water infrastructure condition assessment]]
}}
}}

Revision as of 17:39, 9 May 2022

Fig4 Davies BMJHealthCareInfo2021 28-1.jpg

"Development of a core competency framework for clinical informatics"

Up to this point, there has not been a national core competency framework for clinical informatics in the U.K. Here we report on the final two iterations of work carried out towards the formation of a national core competency framework. This follows an initial systematic literature review of existing skills and competencies and a job listing analysis. An iterative approach was applied to framework development. Using a mixed-methods design, we carried out semi-structured interviews with participants involved in informatics (n = 15). The framework was updated based on the interview findings and was subsequently distributed as part of a bespoke online digital survey for wider participation (n = 87). The final version of the framework is based on the findings of the survey.(Full article...)

Recently featured: