Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text)
(294 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''"[[Journal:Global data quality assessment and the situated nature of “best” research practices in biology|Global data quality assessment and the situated nature of “best” research practices in biology]]"'''
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Mishra JofNepMedAss23 61-258.png|220px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Knowledge of internal quality control for laboratory tests among laboratory personnel working in a biochemistry department of a tertiary care center: A descriptive cross-sectional study|Knowledge of internal quality control for laboratory tests among laboratory personnel working in a biochemistry department of a tertiary care center: A descriptive cross-sectional study]]"'''


This paper reflects on the relation between international debates around data quality assessment and the diversity characterizing research practices, goals and environments within the life sciences. Since the emergence of molecular approaches, many biologists have focused their research, and related methods and instruments for data production, on the study of genes and genomes. While this trend is now shifting, prominent institutions and companies with stakes in molecular biology continue to set standards for what counts as "good science" worldwide, resulting in the use of specific data production technologies as proxy for assessing data quality. This is problematic considering (1) the variability in research cultures, goals and the very characteristics of biological systems, which can give rise to countless different approaches to knowledge production; and (2) the existence of research environments that produce high-quality, significant datasets despite not availing themselves of the latest technologies. Ethnographic research carried out in such environments evidences a widespread fear among researchers that providing extensive information about their experimental set-up will affect the perceived quality of their data, making their findings vulnerable to criticisms by better-resourced peers. These fears can make scientists resistant to sharing data or describing their provenance. ('''[[Journal:Global data quality assessment and the situated nature of “best” research practices in biology|Full article...]]''')<br />
The [[clinical laboratory]] holds a central position in patient care, and as such, ensuring accurate [[laboratory]] test results is a necessity. Internal [[quality control]] (QC) ensures day-to-day laboratory consistency. However, unless practiced, the success of laboratory [[quality management system]]s (QMSs) cannot be achieved. This depends on the efforts and commitment of laboratory personnel for its implementation. Hence, the aim of this study was to find out the knowledge of internal QC for laboratory tests among laboratory personnel working in the Department of Biochemistry, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), a tertiary care center ... ('''[[Journal:Knowledge of internal quality control for laboratory tests among laboratory personnel working in a biochemistry department of a tertiary care center: A descriptive cross-sectional study|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':  
{{flowlist |
: ▪ [[Journal:Neuroimaging, genetics, and clinical data sharing in Python using the CubicWeb framework|Neuroimaging, genetics, and clinical data sharing in Python using the CubicWeb framework]]
* [[Journal:Sigma metrics as a valuable tool for effective analytical performance and quality control planning in the clinical laboratory: A retrospective study|Sigma metrics as a valuable tool for effective analytical performance and quality control planning in the clinical laboratory: A retrospective study]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Analyzing the field of bioinformatics with the multi-faceted topic modeling technique|Analyzing the field of bioinformatics with the multi-faceted topic modeling technique]]
* [[Journal:Why do we need food systems informatics? Introduction to this special collection on smart and connected regional food systems|Why do we need food systems informatics? Introduction to this special collection on smart and connected regional food systems]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Intervene: A tool for intersection and visualization of multiple gene or genomic region sets|Intervene: A tool for intersection and visualization of multiple gene or genomic region sets]]
* [[Journal:Data management challenges for artificial intelligence in plant and agricultural research|Data management challenges for artificial intelligence in plant and agricultural research]]
}}

Revision as of 18:14, 6 May 2024

Fig1 Mishra JofNepMedAss23 61-258.png

"Knowledge of internal quality control for laboratory tests among laboratory personnel working in a biochemistry department of a tertiary care center: A descriptive cross-sectional study"

The clinical laboratory holds a central position in patient care, and as such, ensuring accurate laboratory test results is a necessity. Internal quality control (QC) ensures day-to-day laboratory consistency. However, unless practiced, the success of laboratory quality management systems (QMSs) cannot be achieved. This depends on the efforts and commitment of laboratory personnel for its implementation. Hence, the aim of this study was to find out the knowledge of internal QC for laboratory tests among laboratory personnel working in the Department of Biochemistry, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), a tertiary care center ... (Full article...)
Recently featured:

Retrieved from "https://www.limswiki.org/index.php?title=Template:Article_of_the_week&oldid=63451"