Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text)
(Updated article of the week text)
(120 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Xie BMCBioinfo21 22.png|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Mishra JofNepMedAss23 61-258.png|220px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Popularity and performance of bioinformatics software: The case of gene set analysis|Popularity and performance of bioinformatics software: The case of gene set analysis]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Knowledge of internal quality control for laboratory tests among laboratory personnel working in a biochemistry department of a tertiary care center: A descriptive cross-sectional study|Knowledge of internal quality control for laboratory tests among laboratory personnel working in a biochemistry department of a tertiary care center: A descriptive cross-sectional study]]"'''


Gene set analysis (GSA) is arguably the method of choice for the functional interpretation of omics results. This work explores the popularity and the performance of all the GSA methodologies and software published during the 20 years since its inception. "Popularity" is estimated according to each paper's citation counts, while "performance" is based on a comprehensive evaluation of the validation strategies used by papers in the field, as well as the consolidated results from the existing benchmark studies. Regarding popularity, data is collected into an online open database ("GSARefDB") which allows browsing bibliographic and method-descriptive [[information]] from 503 GSA paper references; regarding performance, we introduce a repository of [[Jupyter Notebook]] [[workflow]]s and Shiny apps for automated benchmarking of GSA methods (“GSA-BenchmarKING”). After comparing popularity versus performance, results show discrepancies between the most popular and the best performing GSA methods. ('''[[Journal:Popularity and performance of bioinformatics software: The case of gene set analysis|Full article...]]''')<br />
The [[clinical laboratory]] holds a central position in patient care, and as such, ensuring accurate [[laboratory]] test results is a necessity. Internal [[quality control]] (QC) ensures day-to-day laboratory consistency. However, unless practiced, the success of laboratory [[quality management system]]s (QMSs) cannot be achieved. This depends on the efforts and commitment of laboratory personnel for its implementation. Hence, the aim of this study was to find out the knowledge of internal QC for laboratory tests among laboratory personnel working in the Department of Biochemistry, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), a tertiary care center ... ('''[[Journal:Knowledge of internal quality control for laboratory tests among laboratory personnel working in a biochemistry department of a tertiary care center: A descriptive cross-sectional study|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':
{{flowlist |
{{flowlist |
* [[Journal:Privacy-preserving healthcare informatics: A review|Privacy-preserving healthcare informatics: A review]]
* [[Journal:Sigma metrics as a valuable tool for effective analytical performance and quality control planning in the clinical laboratory: A retrospective study|Sigma metrics as a valuable tool for effective analytical performance and quality control planning in the clinical laboratory: A retrospective study]]
* [[Journal:Secure data outsourcing in presence of the inference problem: Issues and directions|Secure data outsourcing in presence of the inference problem: Issues and directions]]
* [[Journal:Why do we need food systems informatics? Introduction to this special collection on smart and connected regional food systems|Why do we need food systems informatics? Introduction to this special collection on smart and connected regional food systems]]
* [[Journal:Digital transformation risk management in forensic science laboratories|Digital transformation risk management in forensic science laboratories]]
* [[Journal:Data management challenges for artificial intelligence in plant and agricultural research|Data management challenges for artificial intelligence in plant and agricultural research]]
}}
}}

Revision as of 18:14, 6 May 2024

Fig1 Mishra JofNepMedAss23 61-258.png

"Knowledge of internal quality control for laboratory tests among laboratory personnel working in a biochemistry department of a tertiary care center: A descriptive cross-sectional study"

The clinical laboratory holds a central position in patient care, and as such, ensuring accurate laboratory test results is a necessity. Internal quality control (QC) ensures day-to-day laboratory consistency. However, unless practiced, the success of laboratory quality management systems (QMSs) cannot be achieved. This depends on the efforts and commitment of laboratory personnel for its implementation. Hence, the aim of this study was to find out the knowledge of internal QC for laboratory tests among laboratory personnel working in the Department of Biochemistry, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), a tertiary care center ... (Full article...)
Recently featured: