Difference between revisions of "User:Shawndouglas/sandbox/sublevel9"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(224 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| type      = notice
| type      = notice
| style    = width: 960px;
| style    = width: 960px;
| text      = This is sublevel2 of my sandbox, where I play with features and test MediaWiki code. If you wish to leave a comment for me, please see [[User_talk:Shawndouglas|my discussion page]] instead.<p></p>
| text      = This is sublevel9 of my sandbox, where I play with features and test MediaWiki code. If you wish to leave a comment for me, please see [[User_talk:Shawndouglas|my discussion page]] instead.<p></p>
}}
}}


==Sandbox begins below==
==Sandbox begins below==


As of March 25, 2019
[[File:|right|500px]]


'''Alaska''':
'''Title''': ''LIMS Selection Guide for Materials Testing Laboratories''


The state boasts 75 Limited and 97 Standard Marijuana Cultivation Facilities. The state differentiates a "limited" facility as one with 500 square feet or less of grow operation space, whereas "standard" facilities have no such limitation.<ref name="SummersCult16">{{cite web |url=http://www.alaskajournal.com/2016-03-21/cultivation-licenses-dominate-marijuana-applications |title=Cultivation licenses dominate marijuana applications |author=Summers, D.J. |work=Alaska Journal of Commerce |date=21 March 2016 |accessdate=25 April 2019}}</ref> To review the entire list of 172 cultivation facilities, go to [https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/amco/ https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/amco/] and look for the link "Licenses and Applications by Status."
'''Edition''': First Edition


Licensing fees for limited are $1,000, and $5,000 for standard.<ref name="AMCOMariLic">{{cite web |url=https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/amco/MarijuanaLicenseApplication.aspx |title=Marijuana License Application |author=Alcohol and Marijuana Control Office |publisher=Alaska Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development |accessdate=25 April 2019}}</ref>
'''Author for citation''': Shawn E. Douglas


'''License for content''': [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International]


'''Arizona''':
'''Publication date''': ??? 2023


The government ties cultivation to dispensaries. However, Arizona state law prohibits making public a list of dispensaries, so the state's cultivators/dispensaries are not publicly known.<ref name="AZDHSFAQsDisp">{{cite web |url=https://www.azdhs.gov/licensing/medical-marijuana/index.php#faqs-dispensary |work=FAQs - Dispensary |title=DI31: Can I get a list of the dispensaries? |author=Arizona Department of Health Services |publisher=Government of Arizona |accessdate=25 April 2019}}</ref>


Description goes here...


'''Arkansas''':
The table of contents for ''LIMS Selection Guide for Materials Testing Laboratories'' is as follows:


The five cultivation facilities for Arkansas are<ref name="FieldBuild19">{{cite web |url=https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2019/jan/21/building-underway-all-cannabis-cultivation-sites/ |title=Building underway at all medical marijuana cultivation sites in Arkansas |author=Field, H. |work=Arkansas Democrat Gazette |date=21 January 2019 |accessdate=25 April 2019}}</ref>:
:[[User:Shawndouglas/sandbox/sublevel10|1. Introduction to materials and materials testing laboratories]]
::1.1 Materials testing labs, then and now
:::1.1.1 Materials testing 2.0
::1.2 Industries, products, and raw materials
::1.3 Laboratory roles and activities in the industry
:::1.3.1 R&D roles and activities
:::1.3.2 Pre-manufacturing and manufacturing roles and activities
:::1.3.3 Post-production quality control and regulatory roles and activities


* Bold Team, LLC (Cotton Plant)
:[[User:Shawndouglas/sandbox/sublevel11|2. Standards, regulations, and test methods affecting materials testing labs]]
* Delta Medical Cannabis Co. (Newport)
::2.1 Globally recognized materials manufacturing standards
* Natural State Medicinals Cultivation, LLC (White Hall)
:::2.1.1 American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) materials standards
* Natural State Wellness Enterprises, LLC (Newport)
:::2.1.2 ASTM International Volume 15.04
* Osage Creek Cultivation, LLC (Berryville)
:::2.1.3 Canadian Standards Association (CSA) A3000 series
:::2.1.4 International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 10993
:::2.1.5 Metal Powder Industries Federation (MPIF) Standard 35 family
::2.2 Regulations and laws around the world
:::2.2.1 21 CFR Part 175 and 176 - United States
:::2.2.2 Building Standard Law - Japan
:::2.2.3 The Furniture and Furnishings (Fire) (Safety) Regulations 1988 - United Kingdom
:::2.2.4 National Environment Protection (Used Packaging Materials) Measure 2011 - Australia
:::2.2.5 Surface Coating Materials Regulations (SOR/2016-193) - Canada
::2.3 Standardized test methods for materials
::2.4 Materials laboratory accreditation
:::2.4.1 A note about engineering and construction materials testing


As of March 15, 2019, three of the five were up and running: Bold Team, Osage Creek Cultivation, and Natural State Medicinals Cultivation.<ref name="BrantleyThird19">{{cite web |url=https://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2019/03/15/third-marijuana-cultivation-facility-now-operating |title=Third marijuana cultivation facility now operating |author=Brantley, M. |work=Arkansas Times |date=15 March 2019 |accessdate=25 April 2019}}</ref>
:[[User:Shawndouglas/sandbox/sublevel12|3. Choosing laboratory informatics software for your materials testing lab]]
::3.1 Evaluation and selection
:::3.1.1 Technology considerations
::::3.1.1.1 Laboratory informatics options
:::3.1.2 Features and functions
::::3.1.2.1 Base features
::::3.1.2.2 Specialty features
:::3.1.3 Cybersecurity considerations
:::3.1.4 Regulatory compliance considerations
:::3.1.5 System flexibility
:::3.1.6 Cost considerations
::3.2 Implementation
:::3.2.1 Internal and external integrations
::3.3 MSW, updates, and other contracted services
::3.4 How a user requirements specification fits into the entire process (LIMSpec)


The five facilities were licensed after paying a $100,000 license fee and a $500,000 performance bond.<ref name="GrabensteinArk18">{{cite web |url=https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/arkansas/articles/2018-07-10/ark-medical-marijuana-panel-issues-5-cultivation-licenses |title=Arkansas Issues 5 Medical Marijuana Cultivation Licenses |author=Grabenstein, H. |work=U.S. News |date=10 July 2018 |accessdate=25 April 2019}}</ref>
:[[User:Shawndouglas/sandbox/sublevel13|4. Resources for selecting and implementing informatics solutions]]
::4.1 LIMS vendors
::4.2 Consultants
::4.3 Professional
:::4.3.1 Trade organizations
:::4.3.2 Conferences and trade shows
::4.4 LIMSpec


:[[User:Shawndouglas/sandbox/sublevel14|5. Taking the next step]]
::5.1 Conduct initial research into a specification document tailored to your lab's needs
::5.2 Issue some of the specification as part of a request for information (RFI)
::5.3 Respond to or open dialogue with vendors
:::5.3.1 The value of demonstrations
::5.4 Finalize the requirements specification and choose a vendor


'''California''':
:[[User:Shawndouglas/sandbox/sublevel15|6. Closing remarks]]


The state of California has more than 550 unique temporary cannabis cultivators, more than 140 unique adult-use cultivators, and more than 160 unique medicinal-use cultivators. As of January 1, 2019, the state no longer has the authority to issue temporary licenses, though normal adult-use and medicinal-use cultivation licenses can still be applied for.<ref name="CalCanNotice19">{{cite web |url=https://cannabis.ca.gov/2019/01/08/notice-regarding-temporary-cannabis-cultivation-license-applications/ |title=Notice Regarding Temporary Cannabis Cultivation License Applications |author=CalCannabis Cultivation Licensing |work=California Cannabis Portal |publisher=Government of California |date=07 January 2019 |accessdate=25 April 2019}}</ref> To review the entire list of more than 850 unique cultivation businesses (note: some companies have more than one license), go to [https://aca6.accela.com/CALCANNABIS/Cap/CapHome.aspx?module=Licenses https://aca6.accela.com/CALCANNABIS/Cap/CapHome.aspx?module=Licenses], select the license type, then select "Active" from the License Status. (Active licenses won't be older than January 1, 2018.)
:[[User:Shawndouglas/sandbox/sublevel16|Appendix 1. Blank LIMSpec template for manufacturing labs]]
 
::A1. Introduction and methodology
Application and license fees vary depending on facility type. Consult [https://cannabis.ca.gov/faqs/ the FAQ's] "How much do application/license fees cost?" for the latest regulatory text indicating these fees.
::A2. Primary laboratory workflow
 
::A3. Maintaining laboratory workflow and operations
 
::A4. Specialty laboratory functions
'''Colorado''':
::A5. Technology and performance improvements
 
::A6. Security and integrity of systems and operations
The state has more than 360 unique medical-use and more than 510 unique adult-use cultivators. To review the two lists in their entirety, go to [https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/enforcement/med-licensed-facilities https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/enforcement/med-licensed-facilities] and select the PDF or Excel file labeled "Cultivations" under each column.
::A7. Putting those requirements to practical use and caveats
 
::A8. LIMSpec in Microsoft Word format
Cultivation application and license fees vary based upon operation size. The base fee for everyone is Tier 1 (1 – 1,800 plants) - $1,500.00.<ref name="ColRetail17">{{cite web |url=https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/Complete%20Retail%20Marijuana%20Rules%20as%20of%20April%2014%202017%20with%20DOR%20Disclaimer_1.pdf |format=PDF |title=Retail Marijuana Rules - 1 CCR 212-2 |author=Department of Revenue, Marijuana Enforcement Division |publisher=Government of Colorado |date=14 April 2017 |accessdate=26 April 2019}}</ref>
 
For cultivators who wish to expand their operations, the following is paid in addition to the Tier 1 fee<ref name="ColRetail17" />:
 
* Tier 2 (1,801 – 3,600 plants) - $1,000.00
* Tier 3 (3,601 – 6,000 plants) - $2,000.00
* Tier 4 (6,001 – 10,200 plants) - $4,000.00
* Tier 5 (10,201 – 13,800 plants) - $6,000.00
* Each additional tier of 3,600 plants over Tier 5 - $1,000.00
 
 
'''Connecticut''':
 
According to Connecticut's [https://www.elicense.ct.gov/Lookup/LicenseLookup.aspx license lookup] for medical marijuana producers, the four entities are licensed to cultivate in the state:
 
* [https://advancedgrowlabs.com/ Advanced Grow Labs, LLC]
* [http://www.ctpharma.com/ Connecticut Pharmaceutical Solutions, LLC]
* [https://ct.curaleaf.com/ Curaleaf, LLC]
* [http://theraplant.com/ Theraplant, LLC]
 
The state is not currently accepting new applications. However, the application fees for licenses were $25,000 for the initial applications, a $75,000 registration fee, and a $75,000 renewal fee.<ref name="DCPMedical">{{cite web |url=https://portal.ct.gov/DCP/Medical-Marijuana-Program/Medical-Marijuana-Producer-License |title=Medical Marijuana Producer License |author=Department of Consumer Protection |publisher=Government of Connecticut |accessdate=26 April 2019}}</ref>
 
 
'''Delaware''':
 
The state's cultivation facilities are vertically integrated with its dispensaries, i.e., dispensaries are also cultivators. The three entities operating cultivation centers in Delaware are<ref name="FishmanSecond17">{{cite web |url=https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/local/2017/08/02/second-new-castle-county-medical-marijuana-dispensary-set-open/534020001/ |title=Second New Castle County medical marijuana dispensary set to open |author=Fishman, M. |work=Delaware Online |date=02 August 2017 |accessdate=26 April 2019}}</ref>:
 
* [https://col-care.com/delaware/ Columbia Care, LLC]
* Compassionate Care Research Institute, Inc. (Newark)
* [https://www.firststatecompassion.com/ First State Compassion Center, Inc.] (two locations)
 
These compassion centers pay a $40,000 license fee ever two years.<ref name="DHSSDela16">{{cite web |url=https://dhss.delaware.gov/dhss/dph/hsp/files/mmpannrpt2015.pdf |format=PDF |title=Delaware Medical Marijuana Program Annual Report 2015 |author=Delaware Health and Social Services |publisher=Government of Delaware |date=January 2016 |accessdate=26 April 2019}}</ref>
 
 
'''District of Columbia''':
 
 
 
 
'''Florida''':
 
 
 
'''Hawaii''':
 
 
 
 
'''Illinois''':
 
 
 
 
'''Louisiana''':
 
* Due to an absence of independent testing labs, the Louisiana Department of Agriculture is testing, as of October 2018<ref name="KarlinLouisiana18">{{cite web |url=https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/business/article_b05f7ca4-d6fe-11e8-b997-8ff7036b6c47.html |title=Louisiana medical marijuana delayed after state forced to do product testing, company says |author=Karlin, S. |work=The Advocate |date=23 October 2018 |accessdate=27 November 2018}}</ref>
 
 
'''Maine''':
 
 
 
 
'''Maryland''':
 
 
 
'''Massachusetts''':
 
 
 
 
'''Michigan''':
 
 
 
 
'''Minnesota''':
 
 
 
 
'''Missouri''':
 
* Medical marijuana passed in November 2018; Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services needs to develop testing rules<ref name="MarsoMedical18">{{cite web |url=https://www.kansascity.com/living/health-fitness/article221302705.html |title=Medical marijuana in Missouri: When—and if—you can get it |author=Marso, A. |work=The Kansas City Star |date=16 November 2018 |accessdate=27 November 2018}}</ref>
 
 
'''Montana''':
 
 
 
 
'''Nevada''':
 
 
 
 
'''New Hampshire''':
 
 
 
 
'''New Jersey''':
 
 
 
 
'''New Mexico''':
 
 
 
 
'''New York''':
 
 
 
 
'''North Carolina''':
 
 
 
'''North Dakota''':
 
 
 
 
'''Ohio''':
 
 
 
 
'''Oklahoma''':
 
* As of March 11, 2019, a bill containing testing standards and licensing is set to be signed by the governor.<ref name="DishmanUnity19">{{cite web |url=https://newsok.com/article/5625478/unity-bill-for-medical-marijuana-regulations-expected-to-clear-senate-this-week? |title=Unity Bill for medical marijuana regulations expected to clear Senate this week |author=Dishman, D. |work=NewsOK.com |date=11 March 2019 |accessdate=12 March 2019}}</ref>
 
 
 
'''Oregon'''
 
 
 
 
'''Pennsylvania''':
 
 
 
'''Rhode Island''':
 
 
 
 
'''Utah''':
 
* Medical marijuana passed in November 2018; the state is still working on laboratory testing terms<ref name="USLUtahMedical18">{{cite web |url=https://le.utah.gov/interim/2018/pdf/00004612.pdf |format=PDF |title=Utah Medical Cannabis Act Overview |author=Utah State Legislature |publisher=State of Utah |date=14 November 2018 |accessdate=29 November 2018}}</ref>
 
 
'''Vermont''':
 
 
 
 
'''Washington''':
 
 
 
 
'''West Virginia''':
 
* Still working on developing its medical cannabis program.<ref name="BPHOffice">{{cite web |url=https://dhhr.wv.gov/bph/Pages/Medical-Cannabis-Program.aspx |title=Office of Medical Cannabis |work=Bureau for Public Health |publisher=State of West Virginia |accessdate=29 November 2018}}</ref> Draft legislation says the Bureau for Public Health will be responsible for approving testing laboratories.<ref name="BPHTitle64_17">{{cite web |url=http://dhhr.wv.gov/bph/Documents/MedicalCannabis/Proposed%20Rules/Medical%20Cannabis%20Program%20-%20Laboratories%20-%2064%20CSR%20111%20v1.pdf |format=PDF |title=Title 64, Legislative Rule, Bureau for Public Health, Series 111, Medical Cannabis Program - Laboratories |author=Bureau for Public Health |publisher=State of West Virginia |date=14 December 2017 |accessdate=29 November 2018}}</ref>
 
==References==
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}

Latest revision as of 23:14, 20 September 2023

This is sublevel9 of my sandbox, where I play with features and test MediaWiki code. If you wish to leave a comment for me, please see my discussion page instead.

Sandbox begins below

[[File:|right|500px]]

Title: LIMS Selection Guide for Materials Testing Laboratories

Edition: First Edition

Author for citation: Shawn E. Douglas

License for content: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Publication date: ??? 2023


Description goes here...

The table of contents for LIMS Selection Guide for Materials Testing Laboratories is as follows:

1. Introduction to materials and materials testing laboratories
1.1 Materials testing labs, then and now
1.1.1 Materials testing 2.0
1.2 Industries, products, and raw materials
1.3 Laboratory roles and activities in the industry
1.3.1 R&D roles and activities
1.3.2 Pre-manufacturing and manufacturing roles and activities
1.3.3 Post-production quality control and regulatory roles and activities
2. Standards, regulations, and test methods affecting materials testing labs
2.1 Globally recognized materials manufacturing standards
2.1.1 American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) materials standards
2.1.2 ASTM International Volume 15.04
2.1.3 Canadian Standards Association (CSA) A3000 series
2.1.4 International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 10993
2.1.5 Metal Powder Industries Federation (MPIF) Standard 35 family
2.2 Regulations and laws around the world
2.2.1 21 CFR Part 175 and 176 - United States
2.2.2 Building Standard Law - Japan
2.2.3 The Furniture and Furnishings (Fire) (Safety) Regulations 1988 - United Kingdom
2.2.4 National Environment Protection (Used Packaging Materials) Measure 2011 - Australia
2.2.5 Surface Coating Materials Regulations (SOR/2016-193) - Canada
2.3 Standardized test methods for materials
2.4 Materials laboratory accreditation
2.4.1 A note about engineering and construction materials testing
3. Choosing laboratory informatics software for your materials testing lab
3.1 Evaluation and selection
3.1.1 Technology considerations
3.1.1.1 Laboratory informatics options
3.1.2 Features and functions
3.1.2.1 Base features
3.1.2.2 Specialty features
3.1.3 Cybersecurity considerations
3.1.4 Regulatory compliance considerations
3.1.5 System flexibility
3.1.6 Cost considerations
3.2 Implementation
3.2.1 Internal and external integrations
3.3 MSW, updates, and other contracted services
3.4 How a user requirements specification fits into the entire process (LIMSpec)
4. Resources for selecting and implementing informatics solutions
4.1 LIMS vendors
4.2 Consultants
4.3 Professional
4.3.1 Trade organizations
4.3.2 Conferences and trade shows
4.4 LIMSpec
5. Taking the next step
5.1 Conduct initial research into a specification document tailored to your lab's needs
5.2 Issue some of the specification as part of a request for information (RFI)
5.3 Respond to or open dialogue with vendors
5.3.1 The value of demonstrations
5.4 Finalize the requirements specification and choose a vendor
6. Closing remarks
Appendix 1. Blank LIMSpec template for manufacturing labs
A1. Introduction and methodology
A2. Primary laboratory workflow
A3. Maintaining laboratory workflow and operations
A4. Specialty laboratory functions
A5. Technology and performance improvements
A6. Security and integrity of systems and operations
A7. Putting those requirements to practical use and caveats
A8. LIMSpec in Microsoft Word format
Retrieved from "https://www.limswiki.org/index.php?title=User:Shawndouglas/sandbox/sublevel9&oldid=53063"