Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text)
 
(118 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Jin BMCMedInfoDecMak21 21.png|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig2 Berezin PLoSCompBio23 19-12.png|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Development and implementation of an LIS-based validation system for autoverification toward zero defects in the automated reporting of laboratory test results|Development and implementation of an LIS-based validation system for autoverification toward zero defects in the automated reporting of laboratory test results]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information|Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information]]"'''
 
[[Information]] is the cornerstone of [[research]], from experimental data/[[metadata]] and computational processes to complex inventories of reagents and equipment. These 10 simple rules discuss best practices for leveraging [[laboratory information management system]]s (LIMS) to transform this large information load into useful scientific findings. The development of [[mathematical model]]s that can predict the properties of biological systems is the holy grail of [[computational biology]]. Such models can be used to test biological hypotheses, guide the development of biomanufactured products, engineer new systems meeting user-defined specifications, and much more ... ('''[[Journal:Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information|Full article...]]''')<br />


For [[laboratory informatics]] applications, [[Software verification and validation|validation]] of the autoverification function is one of the critical steps to confirm its effectiveness before use. It is crucial to verify whether the programmed algorithm follows the expected logic and produces the expected results. This process has always relied on the assessment of human–machine consistency and is mostly a manually recorded and time-consuming activity with inherent subjectivity and arbitrariness that cannot guarantee a comprehensive, timely, and continuous effectiveness evaluation of the autoverification function. To overcome these inherent limitations, we independently developed and implemented a [[laboratory information system]] (LIS)-based validation system for autoverification. We developed a correctness verification and integrity validation method (hereinafter referred to as the "new method") in the form of a human–machine dialog ... ('''[[Journal:Development and implementation of an LIS-based validation system for autoverification toward zero defects in the automated reporting of laboratory test results|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':
{{flowlist |
{{flowlist |
* [[Journal:Emerging and established trends to support secure health information exchange|Emerging and established trends to support secure health information exchange]]
* [[Journal:Hierarchical AI enables global interpretation of culture plates in the era of digital microbiology|Hierarchical AI enables global interpretation of culture plates in the era of digital microbiology]]
* [[Journal:Security and privacy in cloud-based eHealth systems|Security and privacy in cloud-based eHealth systems]]
* [[Journal:Critical analysis of the impact of AI on the patient–physician relationship: A multi-stakeholder qualitative study|Critical analysis of the impact of AI on the patient–physician relationship: A multi-stakeholder qualitative study]]
* [[Journal:Using interactive digital notebooks for bioscience and informatics education|Using interactive digital notebooks for bioscience and informatics education]]
* [[Journal:Judgements of research co-created by generative AI: Experimental evidence|Judgements of research co-created by generative AI: Experimental evidence]]
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 18:03, 10 June 2024

Fig2 Berezin PLoSCompBio23 19-12.png

"Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information"

Information is the cornerstone of research, from experimental data/metadata and computational processes to complex inventories of reagents and equipment. These 10 simple rules discuss best practices for leveraging laboratory information management systems (LIMS) to transform this large information load into useful scientific findings. The development of mathematical models that can predict the properties of biological systems is the holy grail of computational biology. Such models can be used to test biological hypotheses, guide the development of biomanufactured products, engineer new systems meeting user-defined specifications, and much more ... (Full article...)

Recently featured:

Retrieved from "https://www.limswiki.org/index.php?title=Template:Article_of_the_week&oldid=64398"