Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text)
(273 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig3 Husen DataSciJourn2017 16-1.png|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Tab1 Williamson F1000Res2023 10.png|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Recommended versus certified repositories: Mind the gap|Recommended versus certified repositories: Mind the gap]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Data management challenges for artificial intelligence in plant and agricultural research|Data management challenges for artificial intelligence in plant and agricultural research]]"'''


Researchers are increasingly required to make research data publicly available in data repositories. Although several organizations propose criteria to recommend and evaluate the quality of data repositories, there is no consensus of what constitutes a good data repository. In this paper, we investigate, first, which data repositories are recommended by various stakeholders (publishers, funders, and community organizations) and second, which repositories are certified by a number of organizations. We then compare these two lists of repositories, and the criteria for recommendation and certification. We find that criteria used by organizations recommending and certifying repositories are similar, although the certification criteria are generally more detailed. We distill the lists of criteria into seven main categories: “Mission,” “Community/Recognition,” “Legal and Contractual Compliance,” “Access/Accessibility,” “Technical Structure/Interface,” “Retrievability,” and “Preservation.” Although the criteria are similar, the lists of repositories that are recommended by the various agencies are very different. Out of all of the recommended repositories, less than six percent obtained certification. As certification is becoming more important, steps should be taken to decrease this gap between recommended and certified repositories, and ensure that certification standards become applicable, and applied, to the repositories which researchers are currently using. ('''[[Journal:Recommended versus certified repositories: Mind the gap|Full article...]]''')<br />
[[Artificial intelligence]] (AI) is increasingly used within plant science, yet it is far from being routinely and effectively implemented in this domain. Particularly relevant to the development of novel food and agricultural technologies is the development of validated, meaningful, and usable ways to integrate, compare, and [[Data visualization|visualize]] large, multi-dimensional datasets from different sources and scientific approaches. After a brief summary of the reasons for the interest in data science and AI within plant science, the paper identifies and discusses eight key challenges in [[Information management|data management]] that must be addressed to further unlock the potential of AI in crop and agronomic research, and particularly the application of [[machine learning]] (ML), which holds much promise for this domain ... ('''[[Journal:Data management challenges for artificial intelligence in plant and agricultural research|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':  
{{flowlist |
: ▪ [[Journal:Usability evaluation of laboratory information systems|Usability evaluation of laboratory information systems]]
* [[Journal:A blockchain-driven IoT-based food quality traceability system for dairy products using a deep learning model|A blockchain-driven IoT-based food quality traceability system for dairy products using a deep learning model]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Data management: New tools, new organization, and new skills in a French research institute|Data management: New tools, new organization, and new skills in a French research institute]]
* [[Journal:Effect of good clinical laboratory practices (GCLP) quality training on knowledge, attitude, and practice among laboratory professionals: Quasi-experimental study|Effect of good clinical laboratory practices (GCLP) quality training on knowledge, attitude, and practice among laboratory professionals: Quasi-experimental study]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Comprehending the health informatics spectrum: Grappling with system entropy and advancing quality clinical research|Comprehending the health informatics spectrum: Grappling with system entropy and advancing quality clinical research]]
* [[Journal:GitHub as an open electronic laboratory notebook for real-time sharing of knowledge and collaboration|GitHub as an open electronic laboratory notebook for real-time sharing of knowledge and collaboration]]
}}

Revision as of 17:50, 15 April 2024

Tab1 Williamson F1000Res2023 10.png

"Data management challenges for artificial intelligence in plant and agricultural research"

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used within plant science, yet it is far from being routinely and effectively implemented in this domain. Particularly relevant to the development of novel food and agricultural technologies is the development of validated, meaningful, and usable ways to integrate, compare, and visualize large, multi-dimensional datasets from different sources and scientific approaches. After a brief summary of the reasons for the interest in data science and AI within plant science, the paper identifies and discusses eight key challenges in data management that must be addressed to further unlock the potential of AI in crop and agronomic research, and particularly the application of machine learning (ML), which holds much promise for this domain ... (Full article...)
Recently featured:

Retrieved from "https://www.limswiki.org/index.php?title=Template:Article_of_the_week&oldid=63298"