Journal:Construction of control charts to help in the stability and reliability of results in an accredited water quality control laboratory

From LIMSWiki
Revision as of 18:31, 17 December 2022 by Shawndouglas (talk | contribs) (Saving and adding more.)
Jump to navigationJump to search
Full article title Construction of control charts to help in the stability and reliability of results in an accredited water quality control laboratory
Journal Sustainability
Author(s) da Silva, Flávia M.O.; Silvério, Karina S.; Castanheira, Maria I.; Raposo, Mariana; Imaginário, Maria J.; Simões, Isabel; Almeida, Maria A.
Author affiliation(s) Polytechnic Institute of Beja
Primary contact Email: flavia dot silva at ipbeja dot pt
Editors Kazak, J.K.; Sciavicco, G.; Kamińska, J.A.
Year published 2022
Volume and issue 14(22)
Article # 15392
DOI 10.3390/su142215392
ISSN 2071-1050
Distribution license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Website https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15392
Download https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15392/pdf (PDF)

Abstract

Overall, laboratory water quality analysis must have stability in their results, especially in laboratories accredited by ISO/IEC 17025. Accredited parameters should be strictly reliable. Using control charts to ascertain divergences between results is thus very useful. The present work applied a methodology of analysis of results through control charts to accurately monitor the results for a wastewater treatment plant. The parameters analyzed were pH, biological oxygen demand for five days (BOD5), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), and total phosphorus (TP). The stability of the results was analyzed from the control charts and 30 analyses performed in the last 12 months. From the results, it was possible to observe whether the results were stable, according to the rehabilitation factor, which cannot exceed WN = 1.00, and the efficiency of removal of pollutants, which remained above 70% for all parameters. The method of determining the technological reliability and stability of the treatment station by use of control charts proves to be an efficient tool for detecting any instability in the results. As such, this method helps to monitor the results of such analyses more clearly and thus enables a rapid response to possible disturbances and maintains the quality of the analysis control, as well as determining the accreditation entities.

Keywords: water quality, control charts, reliability, wastewater treatment

Introduction

Quality management in accredited laboratories consists of a set of actions based on the international regulatory standard ISO/IEC 17025. Maintaining quality across lab operations is seen as fundamental to maintaining the suitability of the lab's services and products. Organizations are increasingly looking for improvement in their processes and procedures (P&P) and have tools contributing to the achievement of their goals. Implementing and improving statistical controls, continuous improvement, training, and participation reduce a process’s variability and consequently increases quality and productivity. Some tools even help to ensure quality control, including check sheets, histograms, and control charts. [1,2] As Samohyl [3] notes, mindfully implementing these and other tools further ensures quality by minimizing variations in the characteristics of products and procedures.

A control chart—and charting in general—is of the main statistical tools used to control and monitor processes. Control charts signal the presence of accidental causes and special causes in a process. [4] According to Corrêa [5], every process has variation, and a natural or common cause is within the control limits. In contrast, so-called special causes need more attention because they indicate values outside the control limits and therefore need rapid correction. Using control charts to manage routine analyses allows easy detection of negative trends in analytical work, enabling quick corrective action, reducing out-of-specification (OOS) results, and consequently avoiding non-compliance. [6] They can be applied in several areas and are used worldwide. A study carried out by Razif [7] proves that the use of control charts contributed to faster detection of anomalies in a daily cycle of analysis and showed similarities in the characteristics of the water quality data of the Surabaya river in Indonesia between 2014 and 2015 for several parameters such as biological oxygen demand for five days (BOD5), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS).

In an analogous study in Brazil using control charts in conjunction with other statistical tools, it was possible to identify a problem in the domestic sewage treatment plant. The treatment did not produce an effluent with characteristics that meet the specifications or release standards of the environmental legislation, indicating the need for restructuring and correction of the efficiency of the process. [8]

The international standard ISO 7870-1:2019 Control charts — Part 1: General guidelines addresses several objectives regarding control charts, including [1]:

  • indicating if the process is stable, comparing information from samples that represent the current state of the process against the control limits that reflect this variability;
  • estimating the magnitude of the variability inherent to the process; and
  • aiming to determine if the variability of the process has remained stable or if there are oscillations.

A 2022 study by Liz and Piotr [9] concluded that control charts could be an effective tool for assessing the operation of a sewage treatment plant, allowing the detection of any disturbances during the sewage treatment process in the tested facility and the rapid correction of those disturbances, ensuring the natural reservoir’s water quality. The Shewhart-type control chart is the most used and has broad applicability. In building this model, a preliminary period of subsequent sample analysis is needed to determine the control limits. [10] After this analysis period, statistical treatment is applied to obtain the control charts.

According to Zan et al. [11], control charts are used to monitor whether a process is controlled or not. They have long been used for quality monitoring of manufacturing processes. If only random causes affect the operation, the production process is considered to be natural or normal. [12] At this time, the control chart tends to fluctuate randomly in the symmetrical coordinate system. The traditional control chart easily detects the abnormity beyond the boundary. Still, it is challenging to identify the range of abnormity given that it usually requires human judgment and is easily affected by various factors.

The problem of water pollution in urban areas is highly relevant today due to progressive urbanization, aging of ecological infrastructure, and high population density. [9,13] The Member States of the European Union, in agreement with the Water Framework Directive (WFD), are obliged to use and protect their water resources rationally. These include the proper treatment of wastewater.

This study aims to apply a methodology of analysis of results through control charts, aiming at accurately monitoring the results for a wastewater treatment plant from a slaughterhouse in a specific region of Alentejo in Portugal. The parameters analyzed were pH, BOD5, COD, TSS, and total phosphorus (TP).

According to Reilly et al. [14], slaughterhouse wastewater presents a biological risk to humans and other animals due to the presence of pathogens, pharmaceuticals, and toxic chemicals used for plant cleaning. [15] This harmful potential means that the disposal of slaughterhouse and dairy waste is often subject to local legislation which has been put in place to protect public health. [16] For example, COD in slaughterhouse wastewater often requires a 95% reduction, with similar levels of treatment being required for TP before final discharge into the environment. [15] Currently, the UK dairy processing and slaughterhouse industries use technologies such as chemical dosing, reverse osmosis, anaerobic digestion, dissolved air floatation, and membrane bioreactors to treat their wastewater. They have been obtaining good results. [17,18,19]

This study will show the construction of control charts helps guide analysts when there are results outside the control lines, making it possible to reassess the results faster if necessary. Going forward, this method will assist laboratories in managing the quality of the results of their water and wastewater analysis.

Materials and methods

Description of the study

The School of Agriculture of the Polytechnic Institute of Beja has a water quality control laboratory accredited to ISO/IEC 17025, where water quality is analyzed. This laboratory is located in Beja, Portugal. The technological process of the wastewater treatment plant analyzed includes mechanical, biological, and chemical treatment of wastewater. The values of pollution indicators for sewage discharged into the municipality to the slaughterhouse may not exceed the following values: pH 19, BOD5 500.0 mg O2·L−1, COD 1500.0 mg O2·L−1, TSS 1000.0 mg·L−1, and TP 25 mg P·L−1. These values are accorded between the company and the municipality.

The objective was thus to create control charts for the pH, BOD5, COD, TSS, and TP parameters in analyzing a wastewater treatment plant from a slaughterhouse in Alentejo for 18 months (2021–2022).

Methods

The methodology was made according to Figure 1. The laboratory receives the wastewater samples, analyzes them, and creates a database with the data. The work was applied from this step forward, where the data was analyzed, and the control charts were created.


Fig1 daSilva Sustain22 14-22.png

Figure 1. Process method

References

Notes

This presentation is faithful to the original, with only a few minor changes to presentation. Grammar was tweaked significantly to improve readability. The PMCID and DOI were also added when they were missing from the original reference.