Journal:Smart information systems in cybersecurity: An ethical analysis
| Full article title | Smart information systems in cybersecurity: An ethical analysis |
|---|---|
| Journal | ORBIT Journal |
| Author(s) | Macnish, Kevin; Fernandez-Inguanzo, Ana; Kirichenko, Alexey |
| Author affiliation(s) | University of Twente, F-Secure |
| Primary contact | Email: k dot macnish at utwente dot nl |
| Year published | 2019 |
| Volume and issue | 2(2) |
| Page(s) | 105 |
| DOI | 10.29297/orbit.v2i2.105 |
| ISSN | 2515-8562 |
| Distribution license | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International |
| Website | https://www.orbit-rri.org/ojs/index.php/orbit/article/view/105 |
| Download | https://www.orbit-rri.org/ojs/index.php/orbit/article/view/105/117 (PDF) |
 |
This article should not be considered complete until this message box has been removed. This is a work in progress. |
Abstract
This report provides an overview of the current implementation of smart information systems (SIS) in the field of cybersecurity. It also identifies the positive and negative aspects of using SIS in cybersecurity, including ethical issues which could arise while using SIS in this area. One company working in the industry of telecommunications (Company A) is analysed in this report. Further specific ethical issues that arise when using SIS technologies in Company A are critically evaluated. Finally, conclusions are drawn on the case study, and areas for improvement are suggested.
Keywords: cybersecurity, ethics, smart information systems, big data
Introduction
Increasing numbers of items are becoming connected to the internet. Cisco—a global leader in information technology, networking, and cybersecurity—estimates that more than 8.7 billion devices were connected to the internet by the end of 2012, a number that will likely rise to over 40 billion in 2020.[1] Cybersecurity has therefore become an important concern both publicly and privately. In the public sector, governments have created and enlarged cybersecurity divisions such as the U.S. Cyber Command and the Chinese “Information Security Base,” whose mission is to provide security to critical national security assets.[1]
In the private sphere, companies are struggling to keep up with the required need for security in the face of increasingly sophisticated attacks from a variety of sources. In 2017, there were “over 130 large-scale, targeted breaches [by hackers of computer networks] in the U.S.,” and “between January 1, 2005 and April 18, 2018 there have been 8,854 recorded breaches.”[2] Furthermore, cyberattacks affect not only the online world, but also lead to vulnerabilities in the physical world, particularly when an attack threatens industries such as healthcare, communications, energy, or military networks, putting large swathes of society at risk. Indeed, it has been argued that some cyberattacks could constitute legitimate grounds for declarations of (physical) war.[3]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Singer, P.W.; Friedman, A. (2014). Cybersecurity and Cyberwar: What Everyone Needs to Know (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199918119. https://books.google.com/books?id=9VDSAQAAQBAJ.
- ↑ Sobers, R. (18 May 2018). "60 Must-Know Cybersecurity Statistics for 2018". Varonis Blog. Archived from the original on 08 November 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20181108122758/https://www.varonis.com/blog/cybersecurity-statistics/. Retrieved 17 December 2018.
- ↑ Smith, P.T. (2015). "Cyberattacks as Casus Belli: A Sovereignty‐Based Account". Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (2): 222–41. doi:10.1111/japp.12169.
Notes
This presentation is faithful to the original, with only a few minor changes to presentation, grammar, and punctuation. In some cases important information was missing from the references, and that information was added. The 2018 article by Sobers on 60 must-know cybersecurity facts has been updated in 2019; an archived version from 2018 is used in this version.
